[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iJ1FZvtyHgXC69YEVirg0B5moKM1eDLSU1skLQV0PNrGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 09:10:20 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, saeed@...nel.org, gnault@...hat.com,
tparkin@...alix.com, Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>,
syzbot+52866e24647f9a23403f@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzbot+94cc2a66fc228b23f360@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net v3 2/2] l2tp: close all race conditions in l2tp_tunnel_register()
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 9:08 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 4:01 AM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>
> >
> > The code in l2tp_tunnel_register() is racy in several ways:
> >
> > 1. It modifies the tunnel socket _after_ publishing it.
> >
> > 2. It calls setup_udp_tunnel_sock() on an existing socket without
> > locking.
> >
> > 3. It changes sock lock class on fly, which triggers many syzbot
> > reports.
> >
> > This patch amends all of them by moving socket initialization code
> > before publishing and under sock lock. As suggested by Jakub, the
> > l2tp lockdep class is not necessary as we can just switch to
> > bh_lock_sock_nested().
> >
> > Fixes: 37159ef2c1ae ("l2tp: fix a lockdep splat")
> > Fixes: 6b9f34239b00 ("l2tp: fix races in tunnel creation")
> > Reported-by: syzbot+52866e24647f9a23403f@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> > Reported-by: syzbot+94cc2a66fc228b23f360@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> > Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> > Cc: Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
> > Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> > Cc: Tom Parkin <tparkin@...alix.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>
> > ---
> > net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c b/net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c
> > index e9c0ce0b7972..b6554e32bb12 100644
> > --- a/net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c
> > +++ b/net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c
> > @@ -1041,7 +1041,7 @@ static int l2tp_xmit_core(struct l2tp_session *session, struct sk_buff *skb, uns
> > IPCB(skb)->flags &= ~(IPSKB_XFRM_TUNNEL_SIZE | IPSKB_XFRM_TRANSFORMED | IPSKB_REROUTED);
> > nf_reset_ct(skb);
> >
> > - bh_lock_sock(sk);
> > + bh_lock_sock_nested(sk);
> > if (sock_owned_by_user(sk)) {
> > kfree_skb(skb);
> > ret = NET_XMIT_DROP;
> > @@ -1385,8 +1385,6 @@ static int l2tp_tunnel_sock_create(struct net *net,
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > -static struct lock_class_key l2tp_socket_class;
> > -
> > int l2tp_tunnel_create(int fd, int version, u32 tunnel_id, u32 peer_tunnel_id,
> > struct l2tp_tunnel_cfg *cfg, struct l2tp_tunnel **tunnelp)
> > {
> > @@ -1482,21 +1480,16 @@ int l2tp_tunnel_register(struct l2tp_tunnel *tunnel, struct net *net,
> > }
> >
> > sk = sock->sk;
> > + lock_sock(sk);
> > write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
> > ret = l2tp_validate_socket(sk, net, tunnel->encap);
> > - if (ret < 0)
> > + if (ret < 0) {
>
> I think we need to write_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock)
> before release_sock(), or risk lockdep reports.
>
Any objection if I propose :
diff --git a/net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c b/net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c
index b6554e32bb12ae7813cc06c01e4d1380af667375..03608d3ded4b83d1e59e064e482f54cffcdf5240
100644
--- a/net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c
+++ b/net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c
@@ -1483,10 +1483,8 @@ int l2tp_tunnel_register(struct l2tp_tunnel
*tunnel, struct net *net,
lock_sock(sk);
write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
ret = l2tp_validate_socket(sk, net, tunnel->encap);
- if (ret < 0) {
- release_sock(sk);
+ if (ret < 0)
goto err_inval_sock;
- }
rcu_assign_sk_user_data(sk, tunnel);
write_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
@@ -1523,6 +1521,7 @@ int l2tp_tunnel_register(struct l2tp_tunnel
*tunnel, struct net *net,
err_inval_sock:
write_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
+ release_sock(sk);
if (tunnel->fd < 0)
sock_release(sock);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists