netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] dt-bindings: net: Add support StarFive dwmac

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <787bb142-1ade-bd48-1f6a-0da992add3d3@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 18 Jan 2023 09:00:04 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     yanhong wang <yanhong.wang@...rfivetech.com>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] dt-bindings: net: Add support StarFive dwmac

On 18/01/2023 02:45, yanhong wang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2023/1/6 20:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 06/01/2023 03:59, Yanhong Wang wrote:
>>> Add documentation to describe StarFive dwmac driver(GMAC).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yanhong Wang <yanhong.wang@...rfivetech.com>
>>> ---
>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml   |   1 +
>>>  .../bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml   | 113 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>  MAINTAINERS                                   |   5 +
>>
>> Order the patches correctly. Why this binding patch is split from previous?
>>
> 
> The previous binding patch was considered to be compatible with JH7100, but after discussion,
> it is not compatible with JH7100 for the time being, so the name of binding has been modified
> in this patch.

I am not asking about name, but why this was split from the patch using
the compatible in the first time. This does not make any sense. Please
squash.

Best regards,
Krzysztof