[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8gNEUJ9ffSdfH51@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:15:29 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"ath10k@...ts.infradead.org" <ath10k@...ts.infradead.org>,
"ath11k@...ts.infradead.org" <ath11k@...ts.infradead.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org" <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] iommu/intel: Add a gfp parameter to
alloc_pgtable_page()
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 01:18:18AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2023 9:30 PM
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 03:35:08AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> > > > Sent: Saturday, January 7, 2023 12:43 AM
> > > >
> > > > @@ -2676,7 +2676,7 @@ static int copy_context_table(struct
> > intel_iommu
> > > > *iommu,
> > > > if (!old_ce)
> > > > goto out;
> > > >
> > > > - new_ce = alloc_pgtable_page(iommu->node);
> > > > + new_ce = alloc_pgtable_page(iommu->node,
> > > > GFP_KERNEL);
> > >
> > > GFP_ATOMIC
> >
> > Can't be:
> >
> > old_ce = memremap(old_ce_phys, PAGE_SIZE,
> > MEMREMAP_WB);
> > if (!old_ce)
> > goto out;
> >
> > new_ce = alloc_pgtable_page(iommu->node,
> > GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!new_ce)
> >
> > memremap() is sleeping.
> >
> > And the only caller is:
> >
> > ctxt_tbls = kcalloc(ctxt_table_entries, sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!ctxt_tbls)
> > goto out_unmap;
> >
> > for (bus = 0; bus < 256; bus++) {
> > ret = copy_context_table(iommu, &old_rt[bus],
> > ctxt_tbls, bus, ext);
> >
>
> Yes, but the patch description says "Push the GFP_ATOMIC to all
> callers." implying it's purely a refactoring w/o changing those
> semantics.
Sure, lets split the patch, it is a good idea
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists