netdev - Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110: Add ethernet device node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 18 Jan 2023 16:51:16 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Yanhong Wang <yanhong.wang@...rfivetech.com>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110: Add ethernet device
 node

On 18/01/2023 07:17, Yanhong Wang wrote:
> Add JH7110 ethernet device node to support gmac driver for the JH7110
> RISC-V SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yanhong Wang <yanhong.wang@...rfivetech.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 93 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
> index c22e8f1d2640..c6de6e3b1a25 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
> @@ -433,5 +433,98 @@
>  			reg-shift = <2>;
>  			status = "disabled";
>  		};
> +
> +		stmmac_axi_setup: stmmac-axi-config {

Why your bindings example is different?

Were the bindings tested? Ahh, no they were not... Can you send only
tested patches?

Was this tested?

> +			snps,lpi_en;
> +			snps,wr_osr_lmt = <4>;
> +			snps,rd_osr_lmt = <4>;
> +			snps,blen = <256 128 64 32 0 0 0>;
> +		};
> +

Best regards,
Krzysztof