[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25315234-d6c9-3b4e-d041-d2e0dcae0d5e@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 13:50:45 -0800
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
CC: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
Maor Dickman <maord@...dia.com>, Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 14/15] net/mlx5e: Remove redundant allocation of spec
in create indirect fwd group
On 1/18/2023 10:36 AM, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> From: Maor Dickman <maord@...dia.com>
>
> mlx5_add_flow_rules supports creating rules without any matches by passing NULL
> pointer instead of spec, if NULL is passed it will use a static empty spec.
> This make allocation of spec in mlx5_create_indir_fwd_group unnecessary.
>
> Remove the redundant allocation.
>
Yep. The code to handle this was added in 5c2aa8ae3a2c ("net/mlx5:
Accept flow rules without match").
Makes sense, saves an allocation and the zero_spec struct used was
already/always on the stack so no change there.
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maor Dickman <maord@...dia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
> ---
> .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/esw/indir_table.c | 10 +---------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/esw/indir_table.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/esw/indir_table.c
> index 8a94870c5b43..9959e9fd15a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/esw/indir_table.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/esw/indir_table.c
> @@ -212,19 +212,12 @@ static int mlx5_create_indir_fwd_group(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
> int err = 0, inlen = MLX5_ST_SZ_BYTES(create_flow_group_in);
> struct mlx5_flow_destination dest = {};
> struct mlx5_flow_act flow_act = {};
> - struct mlx5_flow_spec *spec;
> u32 *in;
>
> in = kvzalloc(inlen, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!in)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - spec = kvzalloc(sizeof(*spec), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!spec) {
> - kvfree(in);
> - return -ENOMEM;
> - }
> -
> /* Hold one entry */
> MLX5_SET(create_flow_group_in, in, start_flow_index, MLX5_ESW_INDIR_TABLE_FWD_IDX);
> MLX5_SET(create_flow_group_in, in, end_flow_index, MLX5_ESW_INDIR_TABLE_FWD_IDX);
> @@ -240,14 +233,13 @@ static int mlx5_create_indir_fwd_group(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
> dest.vport.num = e->vport;
> dest.vport.vhca_id = MLX5_CAP_GEN(esw->dev, vhca_id);
> dest.vport.flags = MLX5_FLOW_DEST_VPORT_VHCA_ID;
> - e->fwd_rule = mlx5_add_flow_rules(e->ft, spec, &flow_act, &dest, 1);
> + e->fwd_rule = mlx5_add_flow_rules(e->ft, NULL, &flow_act, &dest, 1);
> if (IS_ERR(e->fwd_rule)) {
> mlx5_destroy_flow_group(e->fwd_grp);
> err = PTR_ERR(e->fwd_rule);
> }
>
> err_out:
> - kvfree(spec);
> kvfree(in);
> return err;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists