[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <210590039104c51e5b3ffbc3166807cc4617bb92.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 10:17:19 +0100
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, robh@...nel.org, stephen@...workplumber.org,
ecree.xilinx@...il.com, sdf@...gle.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
fw@...len.de, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, razor@...ckwall.org,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/8] net: add basic C code generators for
Netlink
On Thu, 2023-01-19 at 17:53 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
> > Doesn't look that bad overall, IMHO. :)
>
> I hope we can avoid over-focusing on the python tools :P
Oh sure.
> I'm no python expert and the code would use a lot of refactoring.
> But there's only so many hours in the day and the alternative
> seems that it will bit rot in my tree forever :(
>
:)
Yeah I don't mind. The quality of the implementation matters to a point,
but honestly I was just reading through this to convince myself it
wasn't just a totally stinking pile of hacks ;-) Which you/I have
managed, so personally I'm happy with this.
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists