netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/7] phy: Add devm_of_phy_optional

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 19 Jan 2023 09:07:17 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] phy: Add devm_of_phy_optional_get() helper

On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 16:44:35 +0530 Vinod Koul wrote:
> > For merging could you put this one on an immutable branch and then
> > everyone can pull + apply patches for callers from their section?  
> 
> Since this is phy, I can do that and everyone else can merge that in or
> all changes can go thru phy tree

Great! The microchip and ti drivers are relatively actively developed, 
I reckon it's worth going the branch way.