[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230121042436.2661843-10-yury.norov@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 20:24:36 -0800
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Haniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Peter Lafreniere <peter@...jl.ca>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 9/9] lib/cpumask: update comment for cpumask_local_spread()
Now that we have an iterator-based alternative for a very common case
of using cpumask_local_spread for all cpus in a row, it's worth to
mention that in comment to cpumask_local_spread().
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
---
lib/cpumask.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/cpumask.c b/lib/cpumask.c
index 10aa15715c0d..98291b07c756 100644
--- a/lib/cpumask.c
+++ b/lib/cpumask.c
@@ -114,11 +114,29 @@ void __init free_bootmem_cpumask_var(cpumask_var_t mask)
* @i: index number
* @node: local numa_node
*
- * This function selects an online CPU according to a numa aware policy;
- * local cpus are returned first, followed by non-local ones, then it
- * wraps around.
+ * Returns online CPU according to a numa aware policy; local cpus are returned
+ * first, followed by non-local ones, then it wraps around.
*
- * It's not very efficient, but useful for setup.
+ * For those who wants to enumerate all CPUs based on their NUMA distances,
+ * i.e. call this function in a loop, like:
+ *
+ * for (i = 0; i < num_online_cpus(); i++) {
+ * cpu = cpumask_local_spread(i, node);
+ * do_something(cpu);
+ * }
+ *
+ * There's a better alternative based on for_each()-like iterators:
+ *
+ * for_each_numa_hop_mask(mask, node) {
+ * for_each_cpu_andnot(cpu, mask, prev)
+ * do_something(cpu);
+ * prev = mask;
+ * }
+ *
+ * It's simpler and more verbose than above. Complexity of iterator-based
+ * enumeration is O(sched_domains_numa_levels * nr_cpu_ids), while
+ * cpumask_local_spread() when called for each cpu is
+ * O(sched_domains_numa_levels * nr_cpu_ids * log(nr_cpu_ids)).
*/
unsigned int cpumask_local_spread(unsigned int i, int node)
{
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists