| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230123182209.GB108558@ubuntu>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 10:22:09 -0800
From: Hyunwoo Kim <v4bel@...ori.io>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, v4bel@...ori.io,
imv4bel@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org, linux-hams@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
syzbot+caa188bdfc1eeafeb418@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netrom: Fix use-after-free caused by accept on already
connected socket
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 09:24:57AM -0800, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> From: Hyunwoo Kim <v4bel@...ori.io>
> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 08:57:06 -0800
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thank you for your review.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 08:22:00AM -0800, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the patch!
> > >
> > > From: Hyunwoo Kim <v4bel@...ori.io>
> > > Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 07:08:59 -0800
> > > > If listen() and accept() are called on an AF_NETROM socket that
> > > > has already been connect()ed, accept() succeeds in connecting.
> > > > This is because nr_accept() dequeues the skb queued in
> > > > `sk->sk_receive_queue` in nr_connect().
> > > >
> > > > This causes nr_accept() to allocate and return a sock with the
> > > > sk of the parent AF_NETROM socket. And here's where use-after-free
> > > > can happen through complex race conditions:
> > > > ```
> > > > cpu0 cpu1
> > > > 1. socket_2 = socket(AF_NETROM)
> > > > listen(socket_2)
> > > > accepted_socket = accept(socket_2) // loopback connection with socket_1
> > > > 2. socket_1 = socket(AF_NETROM)
> > > > nr_create() // sk refcount : 1
> > > > connect(socket_1) // loopback connection with socket_2
> > > > nr_connect()
> > > > nr_establish_data_link()
> > > > nr_write_internal()
> > > > nr_transmit_buffer()
> > > > nr_route_frame()
> > > > nr_loopback_queue()
> > > > nr_loopback_timer()
> > > > nr_rx_frame()
> > > > nr_process_rx_frame()
> > > > nr_state3_machine()
> > > > nr_queue_rx_frame()
> > > > sock_queue_rcv_skb()
> > > > sock_queue_rcv_skb_reason()
> > > > __sock_queue_rcv_skb()
> > > > __skb_queue_tail(list, skb); // list : sk->sk_receive_queue
> > > >
> > > > 3. listen(socket_1)
> > > > nr_listen()
> > > > uaf_socket = accept(socket_1)
> > > > nr_accept()
> > > > skb_dequeue(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
> > >
> > > Sorry, I didn't understand how this is populated by close(accepted_socket),
> > > especially how skb->sk is set as socket_1's sk.
> >
> > When calling close(accepted_socket), accepted_socket is currently in NR_STATE_3 state,
> > so nr_release() calls `nr_write_internal(sk, NR_DISCREQ)`.
> > In a later flow, nr_rx_frame() is called, where nr_find_socket() is used to get socket_1's sk
> > from the global list `nr_list` (Because `circuit_index` and `circuit_id` used for search were index/id of socket_1's sk):
> > ```
> > sk = NULL;
> >
> > if (circuit_index == 0 && circuit_id == 0) {
> > if (frametype == NR_CONNACK && flags == NR_CHOKE_FLAG)
> > sk = nr_find_peer(peer_circuit_index, peer_circuit_id, src);
> > } else {
> > if (frametype == NR_CONNREQ)
> > sk = nr_find_peer(circuit_index, circuit_id, src);
> > else
> > sk = nr_find_socket(circuit_index, circuit_id); // here
> > }
> > ```
> >
> > And nr_process_rx_frame(), nr_state3_machine(), nr_disconnect() are executed sequentially,
> > and `nr_sk(sk)->state = NR_STATE_0;` is executed, so the state of socket_1 sk becomes NR_STATE_0.
>
> Right, but nr_process_rx_frame() just sends out NR_DISCACK for
> accepted_socket, and nr_disconnect() does not queue skb for socket_1 ?
>
> IIUC, uaf_socket's sk is the same one with socket_1, but I'm wondering
> how the sk is queued up for socket_1's recv queue at 4.
As I understand it, you know that socket_1 and uaf_socket's sk are the same,
but you're confused about how the accepted_socket's sk of number 4 is equal
to socket_1's sk, am I correct?
The sk of socket_1 and the sk of accepted_socket are completely different.
In the flow chart I made, socket_1 and uaf_socket have the same sk,
socket_2 has distinct sk, and accepted_socket has distinct non-overlapping sk.
(There are a total of three sks in the flowchart.)
The reason accepted_socket can refer to the sk of socket_1 in #4 is that
`->your_index` and `->your_id` of the sk of accepted_socket point to the sk of socket_1.
As explained before, this index/id is used to get the sk of socket_1.
(In flowchart #4, nr_process_rx_frame() is called using the sk of socket_1 retrieved
from nr_list, rather than using accepted_socket's own sk)
Please let me know if I'm misunderstanding and giving a strange answer.
>
>
> >
> > As a result, `5. In close(socket_1)`, the code of `case NR_STATE_0:` of nr_release() is executed
> > to free the sk, and finally, by calling `close(uaf_socket)`, UAF occurs by referring to the freed sk.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > > 4. close(accepted_socket)
> > > > nr_release()
> > > > nr_write_internal(sk, NR_DISCREQ)
> > > > nr_transmit_buffer() // NR_DISCREQ
> > > > nr_route_frame()
> > > > nr_loopback_queue()
> > > > nr_loopback_timer()
> > > > nr_rx_frame() // sk : socket_1's sk
> > > > nr_process_rx_frame() // NR_STATE_3
> > > > nr_state3_machine() // NR_DISCREQ
> > > > nr_disconnect()
> > > > nr_sk(sk)->state = NR_STATE_0;
> > > > 5. close(socket_1) // sk refcount : 3
> > > > nr_release() // NR_STATE_0
> > > > sock_put(sk); // sk refcount : 0
> > > > sk_free(sk);
> > > > close(uaf_socket)
> > > > nr_release()
> > > > sock_hold(sk); // UAF
> > > > ```
> > > >
> > > > KASAN report by syzbot:
> > > > ```
> > > > BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in nr_release+0x66/0x460 net/netrom/af_netrom.c:520
> > > > Write of size 4 at addr ffff8880235d8080 by task syz-executor564/5128
> > > >
> > > > CPU: 0 PID: 5128 Comm: syz-executor564 Not tainted 6.2.0-rc1-syzkaller #0
> > > > Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022
> > > > Call Trace:
> > > > <TASK>
> > > > __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
> > > > dump_stack_lvl+0xd1/0x138 lib/dump_stack.c:106
> > > > print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:306 [inline]
> > > > print_report+0x15e/0x461 mm/kasan/report.c:417
> > > > kasan_report+0xbf/0x1f0 mm/kasan/report.c:517
> > > > check_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:183 [inline]
> > > > kasan_check_range+0x141/0x190 mm/kasan/generic.c:189
> > > > instrument_atomic_read_write include/linux/instrumented.h:102 [inline]
> > > > atomic_fetch_add_relaxed include/linux/atomic/atomic-instrumented.h:116 [inline]
> > > > __refcount_add include/linux/refcount.h:193 [inline]
> > > > __refcount_inc include/linux/refcount.h:250 [inline]
> > > > refcount_inc include/linux/refcount.h:267 [inline]
> > > > sock_hold include/net/sock.h:775 [inline]
> > > > nr_release+0x66/0x460 net/netrom/af_netrom.c:520
> > > > __sock_release+0xcd/0x280 net/socket.c:650
> > > > sock_close+0x1c/0x20 net/socket.c:1365
> > > > __fput+0x27c/0xa90 fs/file_table.c:320
> > > > task_work_run+0x16f/0x270 kernel/task_work.c:179
> > > > exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:38 [inline]
> > > > do_exit+0xaa8/0x2950 kernel/exit.c:867
> > > > do_group_exit+0xd4/0x2a0 kernel/exit.c:1012
> > > > get_signal+0x21c3/0x2450 kernel/signal.c:2859
> > > > arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x79/0x5c0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:306
> > > > exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:168 [inline]
> > > > exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x15f/0x250 kernel/entry/common.c:203
> > > > __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:285 [inline]
> > > > syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x50 kernel/entry/common.c:296
> > > > do_syscall_64+0x46/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:86
> > > > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
> > > > RIP: 0033:0x7f6c19e3c9b9
> > > > Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7f6c19e3c98f.
> > > > RSP: 002b:00007fffd4ba2ce8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133
> > > > RAX: 0000000000000116 RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f6c19e3c9b9
> > > > RDX: 0000000000000318 RSI: 00000000200bd000 RDI: 0000000000000006
> > > > RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 000000000000000d R09: 000000000000000d
> > > > R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000055555566a2c0
> > > > R13: 0000000000000011 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
> > > > </TASK>
> > > >
> > > > Allocated by task 5128:
> > > > kasan_save_stack+0x22/0x40 mm/kasan/common.c:45
> > > > kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30 mm/kasan/common.c:52
> > > > ____kasan_kmalloc mm/kasan/common.c:371 [inline]
> > > > ____kasan_kmalloc mm/kasan/common.c:330 [inline]
> > > > __kasan_kmalloc+0xa3/0xb0 mm/kasan/common.c:380
> > > > kasan_kmalloc include/linux/kasan.h:211 [inline]
> > > > __do_kmalloc_node mm/slab_common.c:968 [inline]
> > > > __kmalloc+0x5a/0xd0 mm/slab_common.c:981
> > > > kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:584 [inline]
> > > > sk_prot_alloc+0x140/0x290 net/core/sock.c:2038
> > > > sk_alloc+0x3a/0x7a0 net/core/sock.c:2091
> > > > nr_create+0xb6/0x5f0 net/netrom/af_netrom.c:433
> > > > __sock_create+0x359/0x790 net/socket.c:1515
> > > > sock_create net/socket.c:1566 [inline]
> > > > __sys_socket_create net/socket.c:1603 [inline]
> > > > __sys_socket_create net/socket.c:1588 [inline]
> > > > __sys_socket+0x133/0x250 net/socket.c:1636
> > > > __do_sys_socket net/socket.c:1649 [inline]
> > > > __se_sys_socket net/socket.c:1647 [inline]
> > > > __x64_sys_socket+0x73/0xb0 net/socket.c:1647
> > > > do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> > > > do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> > > > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
> > > >
> > > > Freed by task 5128:
> > > > kasan_save_stack+0x22/0x40 mm/kasan/common.c:45
> > > > kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30 mm/kasan/common.c:52
> > > > kasan_save_free_info+0x2b/0x40 mm/kasan/generic.c:518
> > > > ____kasan_slab_free mm/kasan/common.c:236 [inline]
> > > > ____kasan_slab_free+0x13b/0x1a0 mm/kasan/common.c:200
> > > > kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:177 [inline]
> > > > __cache_free mm/slab.c:3394 [inline]
> > > > __do_kmem_cache_free mm/slab.c:3580 [inline]
> > > > __kmem_cache_free+0xcd/0x3b0 mm/slab.c:3587
> > > > sk_prot_free net/core/sock.c:2074 [inline]
> > > > __sk_destruct+0x5df/0x750 net/core/sock.c:2166
> > > > sk_destruct net/core/sock.c:2181 [inline]
> > > > __sk_free+0x175/0x460 net/core/sock.c:2192
> > > > sk_free+0x7c/0xa0 net/core/sock.c:2203
> > > > sock_put include/net/sock.h:1991 [inline]
> > > > nr_release+0x39e/0x460 net/netrom/af_netrom.c:554
> > > > __sock_release+0xcd/0x280 net/socket.c:650
> > > > sock_close+0x1c/0x20 net/socket.c:1365
> > > > __fput+0x27c/0xa90 fs/file_table.c:320
> > > > task_work_run+0x16f/0x270 kernel/task_work.c:179
> > > > exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:38 [inline]
> > > > do_exit+0xaa8/0x2950 kernel/exit.c:867
> > > > do_group_exit+0xd4/0x2a0 kernel/exit.c:1012
> > > > get_signal+0x21c3/0x2450 kernel/signal.c:2859
> > > > arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x79/0x5c0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:306
> > > > exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:168 [inline]
> > > > exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x15f/0x250 kernel/entry/common.c:203
> > > > __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:285 [inline]
> > > > syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x50 kernel/entry/common.c:296
> > > > do_syscall_64+0x46/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:86
> > > > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
> > > > ```
> > > >
> > > > To fix this problem, nr_listen() returns -EINVAL for sockets that
> > > > successfully nr_connect().
> > > >
> > >
> > > I'd add
> > >
> > > Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> > >
> > > > Reported-by: syzbot+caa188bdfc1eeafeb418@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> > > > Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <v4bel@...ori.io>
> > > > ---
> > > > net/netrom/af_netrom.c | 5 +++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/net/netrom/af_netrom.c b/net/netrom/af_netrom.c
> > > > index 6f7f4392cffb..dcfa606684d7 100644
> > > > --- a/net/netrom/af_netrom.c
> > > > +++ b/net/netrom/af_netrom.c
> > > > @@ -400,6 +400,11 @@ static int nr_listen(struct socket *sock, int backlog)
> > > > struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
> > > >
> > > > lock_sock(sk);
> > > > + if (sock->state == SS_CONNECTED) {
> > >
> > > I guess the same issue happens for SS_CONNECTING (non-blocking connect()),
> > > so this should be
> > >
> > > if (sock->state != SS_UNCONNECTED) {
> > >
> > > ?
> > >
> > > Same for the rose and x25 patches.
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230122173957.GA99728@ubuntu/
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230122170925.GA98061@ubuntu/
> >
> > you're right.
> > I will submit the fixed v2 patches.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Hyunwoo Kim
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Kuniyuki
> > >
> > > > + release_sock(sk);
> > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > if (sk->sk_state != TCP_LISTEN) {
> > > > memset(&nr_sk(sk)->user_addr, 0, AX25_ADDR_LEN);
> > > > sk->sk_max_ack_backlog = backlog;
> > > > --
> > > > 2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists