[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230123194020.GA115501@ubuntu>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 11:40:20 -0800
From: Hyunwoo Kim <v4bel@...ori.io>
To: ralf@...ux-mips.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: v4bel@...ori.io, imv4bel@...il.com, linux-hams@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] net/rose: Fix to not accept on connected socket
If listen() and accept() are called on a rose socket
that connect() is successful, accept() succeeds immediately.
This is because rose_connect() queues the skb to
sk->sk_receive_queue, and rose_accept() dequeues it.
This creates a child socket with the sk of the parent
rose socket, which can cause confusion.
Fix rose_listen() to return -EINVAL if the socket has
already been successfully connected, and add lock_sock
to prevent this issue.
Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <v4bel@...ori.io>
---
net/rose/af_rose.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/rose/af_rose.c b/net/rose/af_rose.c
index 36fefc3957d7..ca2b17f32670 100644
--- a/net/rose/af_rose.c
+++ b/net/rose/af_rose.c
@@ -488,6 +488,12 @@ static int rose_listen(struct socket *sock, int backlog)
{
struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
+ lock_sock(sk);
+ if (sock->state != SS_UNCONNECTED) {
+ release_sock(sk);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
if (sk->sk_state != TCP_LISTEN) {
struct rose_sock *rose = rose_sk(sk);
@@ -497,8 +503,10 @@ static int rose_listen(struct socket *sock, int backlog)
memset(rose->dest_digis, 0, AX25_ADDR_LEN * ROSE_MAX_DIGIS);
sk->sk_max_ack_backlog = backlog;
sk->sk_state = TCP_LISTEN;
+ release_sock(sk);
return 0;
}
+ release_sock(sk);
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists