[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iLQeHsf9=ZqUvU0Y_CVsHbzvd07sdFfOH-poFmGqtn0cA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 21:56:09 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Mantas Mikulėnas <grawity@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: traceroute failure in kernel 6.1 and 6.2
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 8:25 PM Mantas Mikulėnas <grawity@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On 2023-01-23 17:21, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 7:09 PM Mantas Mikulėnas <grawity@...il.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Not sure whether this has been reported, but:
> >>
> >> After upgrading from kernel 6.0.7 to 6.1.6 on Arch Linux, unprivileged
> >> ICMP traceroute using the `traceroute -I` tool stopped working – it very
> >> reliably fails with a "No route to host" at some point:
> >>
> >> myth> traceroute -I 83.171.33.188
> >> traceroute to 83.171.33.188 (83.171.33.188), 30 hops max, 60
> >> byte packets
> >> 1 _gateway (192.168.1.1) 0.819 ms
> >> send: No route to host
> >> [exited with 1]
> >>
> >> while it still works for root:
> >>
> >> myth> sudo traceroute -I 83.171.33.188
> >> traceroute to 83.171.33.188 (83.171.33.188), 30 hops max, 60
> >> byte packets
> >> 1 _gateway (192.168.1.1) 0.771 ms
> >> 2 * * *
> >> 3 10.69.21.145 (10.69.21.145) 47.194 ms
> >> 4 82-135-179-168.static.zebra.lt (82.135.179.168) 49.124 ms
> >> 5 213-190-41-3.static.telecom.lt (213.190.41.3) 44.211 ms
> >> 6 193.219.153.25 (193.219.153.25) 77.171 ms
> >> 7 83.171.33.188 (83.171.33.188) 78.198 ms
> >>
> >> According to `git bisect`, this started with:
> >>
> >> commit 0d24148bd276ead5708ef56a4725580555bb48a3
> >> Author: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> >> Date: Tue Oct 11 14:27:29 2022 -0700
> >>
> >> inet: ping: fix recent breakage
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> It still happens with a fresh 6.2rc build, unless I revert that commit.
> >>
> >> The /bin/traceroute is the one that calls itself "Modern traceroute for
> >> Linux, version 2.1.1", on Arch Linux. It seems to use socket(AF_INET,
> >> SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_ICMP), has neither setuid nor file capabilities.
> >> (The problem does not occur if I run it as root.)
> >>
> >> This version of `traceroute` sends multiple probes at once (with TTLs
> >> 1..16); according to strace, the first approx. 8-12 probes are sent
> >> successfully, but eventually sendto() fails with EHOSTUNREACH. (Though
> >> if I run it on local tty as opposed to SSH, it fails earlier.) If I use
> >> -N1 to have it only send one probe at a time, the problem doesn't seem
> >> to occur.
> >
> >
> >
> > I was not able to reproduce the issue (downloading
> > https://sourceforge.net/projects/traceroute/files/latest/download)
> >
> > I suspect some kind of bug in this traceroute, when/if some ICMP error
> > comes back.
> >
> > Double check by
> >
> > tcpdump -i ethXXXX icmp
> >
> > While you run traceroute -I ....
>
> Hmm, no, the only ICMP errors I see in tcpdump are "Time exceeded in
> transit", which is expected for traceroute. Nothing else shows up.
>
> (But when I test against an address that causes *real* ICMP "Host
> unreachable" errors, it seems to handle those correctly and prints "!H"
> as usual -- that is, if it reaches that point without dying.)
>
> I was able to reproduce this on a fresh Linode 1G instance (starting
> with their Arch image), where it also happens immediately:
>
> # pacman -Sy archlinux-keyring
> # pacman -Syu
> # pacman -Sy traceroute strace
> # reboot
> # uname -r
> 6.1.7-arch1-1
> # useradd foo
> # su -c "traceroute -I 8.8.8.8" foo
> traceroute to 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
> 1 10.210.1.195 (10.210.1.195) 0.209 ms
> send: No route to host
>
> So now I'm fairly sure it is not something caused by my own network, either.
>
> On one system, it seems to work properly about half the time, if I keep
> re-running the same command.
>
Here, running the latest upstream tree and latest traceroute, I have no issue.
Send us :
1) strace output
2) icmp packet capture.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists