| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAKH8qBvO3QiR9tvu6=ic-A79O5qp8=WMSL8VR6sCDvO4cmOKqg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 14:58:56 -0800
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with Linus' tree
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 2:44 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in:
>
> kernel/bpf/offload.c
>
> between commit:
>
> ef01f4e25c17 ("bpf: restore the ebpf program ID for BPF_AUDIT_UNLOAD and PERF_BPF_EVENT_PROG_UNLOAD")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> 89bbc53a4dbb ("bpf: Reshuffle some parts of bpf/offload.c")
>
> from the bpf-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Yeah, that looks like a correct resolution, thank you!
Not sure what would've been the correct way to handle it in bpf-next
(except waiting for bpf tree to be merged)?
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc kernel/bpf/offload.c
> index 190d9f9dc987,e87cab2ed710..000000000000
> --- a/kernel/bpf/offload.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/offload.c
> @@@ -75,20 -74,124 +74,121 @@@ bpf_offload_find_netdev(struct net_devi
> return rhashtable_lookup_fast(&offdevs, &netdev, offdevs_params);
> }
>
> - int bpf_prog_offload_init(struct bpf_prog *prog, union bpf_attr *attr)
> + static int __bpf_offload_dev_netdev_register(struct bpf_offload_dev *offdev,
> + struct net_device *netdev)
> {
> struct bpf_offload_netdev *ondev;
> - struct bpf_prog_offload *offload;
> int err;
>
> - if (attr->prog_type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS &&
> - attr->prog_type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + ondev = kzalloc(sizeof(*ondev), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ondev)
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> - if (attr->prog_flags)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + ondev->netdev = netdev;
> + ondev->offdev = offdev;
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ondev->progs);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ondev->maps);
> +
> + err = rhashtable_insert_fast(&offdevs, &ondev->l, offdevs_params);
> + if (err) {
> + netdev_warn(netdev, "failed to register for BPF offload\n");
> + goto err_free;
> + }
> +
> + if (offdev)
> + list_add(&ondev->offdev_netdevs, &offdev->netdevs);
> + return 0;
> +
> + err_free:
> + kfree(ondev);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + static void __bpf_prog_offload_destroy(struct bpf_prog *prog)
> + {
> + struct bpf_prog_offload *offload = prog->aux->offload;
> +
> + if (offload->dev_state)
> + offload->offdev->ops->destroy(prog);
> +
> - /* Make sure BPF_PROG_GET_NEXT_ID can't find this dead program */
> - bpf_prog_free_id(prog, true);
> -
> + list_del_init(&offload->offloads);
> + kfree(offload);
> + prog->aux->offload = NULL;
> + }
> +
> + static int bpf_map_offload_ndo(struct bpf_offloaded_map *offmap,
> + enum bpf_netdev_command cmd)
> + {
> + struct netdev_bpf data = {};
> + struct net_device *netdev;
> +
> + ASSERT_RTNL();
> +
> + data.command = cmd;
> + data.offmap = offmap;
> + /* Caller must make sure netdev is valid */
> + netdev = offmap->netdev;
> +
> + return netdev->netdev_ops->ndo_bpf(netdev, &data);
> + }
> +
> + static void __bpf_map_offload_destroy(struct bpf_offloaded_map *offmap)
> + {
> + WARN_ON(bpf_map_offload_ndo(offmap, BPF_OFFLOAD_MAP_FREE));
> + /* Make sure BPF_MAP_GET_NEXT_ID can't find this dead map */
> + bpf_map_free_id(&offmap->map, true);
> + list_del_init(&offmap->offloads);
> + offmap->netdev = NULL;
> + }
> +
> + static void __bpf_offload_dev_netdev_unregister(struct bpf_offload_dev *offdev,
> + struct net_device *netdev)
> + {
> + struct bpf_offload_netdev *ondev, *altdev = NULL;
> + struct bpf_offloaded_map *offmap, *mtmp;
> + struct bpf_prog_offload *offload, *ptmp;
> +
> + ASSERT_RTNL();
> +
> + ondev = rhashtable_lookup_fast(&offdevs, &netdev, offdevs_params);
> + if (WARN_ON(!ondev))
> + return;
> +
> + WARN_ON(rhashtable_remove_fast(&offdevs, &ondev->l, offdevs_params));
> +
> + /* Try to move the objects to another netdev of the device */
> + if (offdev) {
> + list_del(&ondev->offdev_netdevs);
> + altdev = list_first_entry_or_null(&offdev->netdevs,
> + struct bpf_offload_netdev,
> + offdev_netdevs);
> + }
> +
> + if (altdev) {
> + list_for_each_entry(offload, &ondev->progs, offloads)
> + offload->netdev = altdev->netdev;
> + list_splice_init(&ondev->progs, &altdev->progs);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(offmap, &ondev->maps, offloads)
> + offmap->netdev = altdev->netdev;
> + list_splice_init(&ondev->maps, &altdev->maps);
> + } else {
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(offload, ptmp, &ondev->progs, offloads)
> + __bpf_prog_offload_destroy(offload->prog);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(offmap, mtmp, &ondev->maps, offloads)
> + __bpf_map_offload_destroy(offmap);
> + }
> +
> + WARN_ON(!list_empty(&ondev->progs));
> + WARN_ON(!list_empty(&ondev->maps));
> + kfree(ondev);
> + }
> +
> + static int __bpf_prog_dev_bound_init(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct net_device *netdev)
> + {
> + struct bpf_offload_netdev *ondev;
> + struct bpf_prog_offload *offload;
> + int err;
>
> offload = kzalloc(sizeof(*offload), GFP_USER);
> if (!offload)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists