[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230123112411.ofw6cx3qv6uh4txi@skbuf>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 13:24:11 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Xiaoliang Yang <xiaoliang.yang_1@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/6] net: enetc: add definition for offset
between eMAC and pMAC regs
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 05:29:33PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> > +#define ENETC_PMAC_OFFSET 0x1000
> > +
> > #define ENETC_PM0_CMD_CFG 0x8008
> > #define ENETC_PM1_CMD_CFG 0x9008
> > #define ENETC_PM0_TX_EN BIT(0)
> > @@ -280,57 +282,57 @@ enum enetc_bdr_type {TX, RX};
> > /* Port MAC counters: Port MAC 0 corresponds to the eMAC and
> > * Port MAC 1 to the pMAC.
> > */
> > -#define ENETC_PM_REOCT(mac) (0x8100 + 0x1000 * (mac))
> > -#define ENETC_PM_RALN(mac) (0x8110 + 0x1000 * (mac))
>
> ...
>
> > +#define ENETC_PM_REOCT(mac) (0x8100 + ENETC_PMAC_OFFSET * (mac))
> > +#define ENETC_PM_RALN(mac) (0x8110 + ENETC_PMAC_OFFSET * (mac))
>
> I'm not sure if it is an improvement, but did you consider something
> like this? *completely untested*
>
> #define ENETC_PM(mac, reg) ((reg) + ENETC_PMAC_OFFSET * (mac))
> #define ENETC_PM_REOCT(mac) ENETC_PM(mac, 0x8100)
> #define ENETC_PM_RALN(mac) ENETC_PM(mac, 0x8110)
Hmm, I appreciate you looking at the patch, but in the end, I just
consider your proposed alternative to be a variation on the same theme,
and not necessarily a better way of expressing the definitions.
This means I wouldn't consider resending the patch set just to make this
change.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists