[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8537aa82-8ac9-3f76-c8ae-395a60ccddf8@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 14:38:35 +0200
From: Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@...a.com>, Aya Levin <ayal@...dia.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] mlx5: fix skb leak while fifo resync
On 22/01/2023 18:16, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> During ptp resync operation SKBs were poped from the fifo but were never
> freed neither by napi_consume nor by dev_kfree_skb_any. Add call to
> napi_consume_skb to properly free SKBs.
>
> Fixes: 19b43a432e3e ("net/mlx5e: Extend SKB room check to include PTP-SQ")
Same comment as previous patch?
> Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@...a.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/ptp.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/ptp.c
> index 11a99e0f00c6..d60bb997c53b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/ptp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/ptp.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ static bool mlx5e_ptp_skb_fifo_ts_cqe_resync(struct mlx5e_ptpsq *ptpsq, u16 skb_
> hwts.hwtstamp = mlx5e_skb_cb_get_hwts(skb)->cqe_hwtstamp;
> skb_tstamp_tx(skb, &hwts);
> ptpsq->cq_stats->resync_cqe++;
> + napi_consume_skb(skb, 1);
Was wondering whether we should pass the actual budget here instead of
1, but looking at napi_consume_skb() it doesn't really matter..
Anyway:
Reviewed-by: Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>
> skb_cc = PTP_WQE_CTR2IDX(ptpsq->skb_fifo_cc);
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists