[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y86IgKLKITyw0K9E@corigine.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 14:15:44 +0100
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
oss-drivers@...igine.com,
Huanhuan Wang <huanhuan.wang@...igine.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] nfp: support IPsec offloading for NFP3800
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 10:50:24AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 12:38:42PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> > From: Huanhuan Wang <huanhuan.wang@...igine.com>
> >
> > Add IPsec offloading support for NFP3800.
> > Including data plane and control plane.
> >
> > Data plane: add IPsec packet process flow in NFP3800 datapath (NFDK).
> >
> > Control plane: add a algorithm support distinction of flow
> > in xfrm hook function xdo_dev_state_add as NFP3800
> > supports a different set of IPsec algorithms.
> >
> > This matches existing support for the NFP6000/NFP4000 and
> > their NFD3 datapath.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Huanhuan Wang <huanhuan.wang@...igine.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/Makefile | 2 +-
> > .../net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/crypto/ipsec.c | 9 ++++
> > drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfd3/dp.c | 5 +-
> > drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfdk/dp.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++--
> > .../net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfdk/ipsec.c | 17 +++++++
> > .../net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfdk/nfdk.h | 8 ++++
> > 6 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfdk/ipsec.c
>
> <...>
>
> > md_bytes = sizeof(meta_id) +
> > !!md_dst * NFP_NET_META_PORTID_SIZE +
> > - vlan_insert * NFP_NET_META_VLAN_SIZE;
> > + vlan_insert * NFP_NET_META_VLAN_SIZE +
> > + *ipsec * NFP_NET_META_IPSEC_FIELD_SIZE;
>
> *ipsec is boolean variable, so you are assuming that true is always 1.
> I'm not sure that it is always correct.
Thanks, I do see what you are saying.
But I think what is there is consistent with the existing
use if md_dst and vlan_insert.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists