lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230123223305.30c586ee@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2023 22:33:05 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@...adcom.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, jgg@...pe.ca, leon@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        michael.chan@...adcom.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, selvin.xavier@...adcom.com,
        Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 1/8] bnxt_en: Add auxiliary driver support

On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 22:05:28 -0800 Ajit Khaparde wrote:
> @@ -13212,6 +13214,7 @@ static void bnxt_remove_one(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  	kfree(bp->rss_indir_tbl);
>  	bp->rss_indir_tbl = NULL;
>  	bnxt_free_port_stats(bp);
> +	bnxt_aux_priv_free(bp);
>  	free_netdev(dev);

You're still freeing the memory in which struct device sits regardless
of its reference count.

Greg, is it legal to call:
  
	auxiliary_device_delete(adev);  // AKA device_del(&auxdev->dev);
	auxiliary_device_uninit(adev);  // AKA put_device(&auxdev->dev);
	free(adev);			// frees struct device

? I tried to explain this three times, maybe there's some wait during
device_del() I'm not seeing which makes this safe :S

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ