[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230124164832.71674574@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 16:48:32 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc: Bar Shapira <bar.shapira.work@...il.com>,
Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@...dia.com>,
Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>,
Vincent Cheng <vincent.cheng.xh@...esas.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 03/15] net/mlx5: Add adjphase function to support
hardware-only offset control
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 11:15:31 -0800 Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:33:05PM +0200, Bar Shapira wrote:
> > I guess this expectation should be part of the documentation too, right? Are
> > there more expectations when calling adjphase?
>
> I'll gladly ack improvements to the documentation. I myself won't
> spend time on that, because it will only get ignored, even when it is
> super clear. Like ptp_clock_register(), for example.
IMHO it is a responsibility of maintainers to try to teach, even if not
everyone turns out to be a diligent listener/reader. I've looked for
information about this callback at least twice in the last 6 months.
nVidia folks, could you please improve the doc, in that case?
I think you also owe me the docs for your "debug" configuration
of hairpin queues in debugfs.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists