[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230125022854.69146-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 18:28:54 -0800
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: <v4bel@...ori.io>
CC: <kuniyu@...zon.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<imv4bel@...il.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<linux-hams@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/rose: Fix to not accept on connected socket
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 18:08:09 -0800
> From: Hyunwoo Kim <v4bel@...ori.io>
> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 11:40:20 -0800
> > If listen() and accept() are called on a rose socket
> > that connect() is successful, accept() succeeds immediately.
> > This is because rose_connect() queues the skb to
> > sk->sk_receive_queue, and rose_accept() dequeues it.
Same comment for the netrom patch here.
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230125014347.65971-1-kuniyu@amazon.com/
The skb which the problematic accept() dequeues is created by
sendmsg(), not connect(), right ?
> >
> > This creates a child socket with the sk of the parent
> > rose socket, which can cause confusion.
> >
> > Fix rose_listen() to return -EINVAL if the socket has
> > already been successfully connected, and add lock_sock
> > to prevent this issue.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <v4bel@...ori.io>
>
> Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
>
>
> > ---
> > net/rose/af_rose.c | 8 ++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/rose/af_rose.c b/net/rose/af_rose.c
> > index 36fefc3957d7..ca2b17f32670 100644
> > --- a/net/rose/af_rose.c
> > +++ b/net/rose/af_rose.c
> > @@ -488,6 +488,12 @@ static int rose_listen(struct socket *sock, int backlog)
> > {
> > struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
> >
> > + lock_sock(sk);
> > + if (sock->state != SS_UNCONNECTED) {
> > + release_sock(sk);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > if (sk->sk_state != TCP_LISTEN) {
> > struct rose_sock *rose = rose_sk(sk);
> >
> > @@ -497,8 +503,10 @@ static int rose_listen(struct socket *sock, int backlog)
> > memset(rose->dest_digis, 0, AX25_ADDR_LEN * ROSE_MAX_DIGIS);
> > sk->sk_max_ack_backlog = backlog;
> > sk->sk_state = TCP_LISTEN;
> > + release_sock(sk);
> > return 0;
> > }
> > + release_sock(sk);
> >
> > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists