netdev - Re: [net-next 03/15] net/mlx5: Add adjphase function to support hardware-only offset control

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 25 Jan 2023 10:28:47 +0200
From:   Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Bar Shapira <bar.shapira.work@...il.com>,
        Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@...dia.com>,
        Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
        Vincent Cheng <vincent.cheng.xh@...esas.com>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 03/15] net/mlx5: Add adjphase function to support
 hardware-only offset control

On 25/01/2023 2:48, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 11:15:31 -0800 Richard Cochran wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:33:05PM +0200, Bar Shapira wrote:
>>> I guess this expectation should be part of the documentation too, right? Are
>>> there more expectations when calling adjphase?  
>>
>> I'll gladly ack improvements to the documentation. I myself won't
>> spend time on that, because it will only get ignored, even when it is
>> super clear.  Like ptp_clock_register(), for example.
> 
> IMHO it is a responsibility of maintainers to try to teach, even if not
> everyone turns out to be a diligent listener/reader. I've looked for
> information about this callback at least twice in the last 6 months.
> 
> nVidia folks, could you please improve the doc, in that case? 
> I think you also owe me the docs for your "debug" configuration 
> of hairpin queues in debugfs.

I have patches converting the hairpin debugfs to devlink params, the
write debugfs files will be reverted.