[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87tu0dkt1h.fsf@toke.dk>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 20:14:02 +0100
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>, nbd@....name
Cc: alexander.duyck@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, hawk@...nel.org, ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org,
kuba@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linyunsheng@...wei.com, lorenzo@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net PATCH] skb: Do mix page pool and page referenced frags in GRO
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com> writes:
> From: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>
>
> GSO should not merge page pool recycled frames with standard reference
> counted frames. Traditionally this didn't occur, at least not often.
> However as we start looking at adding support for wireless adapters there
> becomes the potential to mix the two due to A-MSDU repartitioning frames in
> the receive path. There are possibly other places where this may have
> occurred however I suspect they must be few and far between as we have not
> seen this issue until now.
>
> Fixes: 53e0961da1c7 ("page_pool: add frag page recycling support in page pool")
> Reported-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>
I know I'm pattern matching a bit crudely here, but we recently had
another report where doing a get_page() on skb->head didn't seem to be
enough; any chance they might be related?
See: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Y9BfknDG0LXmruDu@JNXK7M3
-Toke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists