netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v1 00/10] Convert drivers to return XFRM configuration errors through extack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 26 Jan 2023 10:43:03 +0100
From:   Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
        Ayush Sawal <ayush.sawal@...lsio.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
        "Jay Vosburgh" <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
        Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <oss-drivers@...igine.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Raju Rangoju <rajur@...lsio.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
        Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
        Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 00/10] Convert drivers to return XFRM
 configuration errors through extack

On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 11:01:33AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 13:54:56 +0200 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > This series continues effort started by Sabrina to return XFRM configuration
> > errors through extack. It allows for user space software stack easily present
> > driver failure reasons to users.
> 
> Steffen, would you like to take these into your tree or should we apply
> directly? Looks like mostly driver changes.

You can just take it directly as it is mostly driver changes.
The ipsec-next tree is currently empty so there will be no
conflicts.

Thanks!