[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230126094303.GA665047@gauss3.secunet.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 10:43:03 +0100
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
Ayush Sawal <ayush.sawal@...lsio.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
<intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"Jay Vosburgh" <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<oss-drivers@...igine.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Raju Rangoju <rajur@...lsio.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 00/10] Convert drivers to return XFRM
configuration errors through extack
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 11:01:33AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 13:54:56 +0200 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > This series continues effort started by Sabrina to return XFRM configuration
> > errors through extack. It allows for user space software stack easily present
> > driver failure reasons to users.
>
> Steffen, would you like to take these into your tree or should we apply
> directly? Looks like mostly driver changes.
You can just take it directly as it is mostly driver changes.
The ipsec-next tree is currently empty so there will be no
conflicts.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists