netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/6] net/sched: cls_api: Support hardware miss to tc action

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 28 Jan 2023 00:18:44 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Paul Blakey <paulb@...dia.com>
Cc:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Oz Shlomo <ozsh@...dia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>,
        Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>, Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/6] net/sched: cls_api: Support hardware
 miss to tc action

On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 00:16:40 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 17:32:12 +0200 Paul Blakey wrote:
> > This series adds support for hardware miss to instruct tc to continue execution
> > in a specific tc action instance on a filter's action list. The mlx5 driver patch
> > (besides the refactors) shows its usage instead of using just chain restore.
> > 
> > Currently a filter's action list must be executed all together or
> > not at all as driver are only able to tell tc to continue executing from a
> > specific tc chain, and not a specific filter/action.
> > 
> > This is troublesome with regards to action CT, where new connections should
> > be sent to software (via tc chain restore), and established connections can
> > be handled in hardware.  
> 
> I'll mark this as Deferred - would be great if Red Hat OvS offload
> folks and/or another vendor and/or Jamal gave their acks.

Ignore that, it's already Changes Requested.. 🤷️