[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2ad147d3-b127-b192-c2a5-29fa704cf3a1@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2023 23:11:46 +0800
From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: kgraul@...ux.ibm.com, wenjia@...ux.ibm.com, jaka@...ux.ibm.com
Cc: kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/7] net/smc: remove locks
smc_client_lgr_pending and smc_server_lgr_pending
On 11/26/22 5:03 PM, D.Wythe wrote:
> From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
> This patch attempts to remove locks named smc_client_lgr_pending and
> smc_server_lgr_pending, which aim to serialize the creation of link
> group. However, once link group existed already, those locks are
> meaningless, worse still, they make incoming connections have to be
> queued one after the other.
>
> Now, the creation of link group is no longer generated by competition,
> but allocated through following strategy.
>
Hi, all
I have noticed that there may be some difficulties in the advancement of this series of patches.
I guess the main problem is to try remove the global lock in this patch, the risks of removing locks
do harm to SMC-D, at the same time, this patch of removing locks is also a little too complex.
So, I am considering that we can temporarily delay the advancement of this patch. We can works on
other patches first. Other patches are either simple enough or have no obvious impact on SMC-D.
What do you think?
Best wishes.
D. Wythe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists