[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9faOzCkeNea1bmd@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 16:54:51 +0200
From: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Abel Vesa <abelvesa@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/19] clk: imx6ul: fix enet1 gate configuration
On 23-01-30 13:15:30, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 07:32:31PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > On 23-01-17 07:14:49, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > > According to the "i.MX 6UltraLite Applications Processor Reference Manual,
> > > Rev. 2, 03/2017", BIT(13) is ENET1_125M_EN which is not controlling root
> > > of PLL6. It is controlling ENET1 separately.
> > >
> > > So, instead of this picture (implementation before this patch):
> > > fec1 <- enet_ref (divider) <---------------------------,
> > > |- pll6_enet (gate)
> > > fec2 <- enet2_ref_125m (gate) <- enet2_ref (divider) <-´
> > >
> > > we should have this one (after this patch):
> > > fec1 <- enet1_ref_125m (gate) <- enet1_ref (divider) <-,
> > > |- pll6_enet
> > > fec2 <- enet2_ref_125m (gate) <- enet2_ref (divider) <-´
> > >
> > > With this fix, the RMII reference clock will be turned off, after
> > > setting network interface down on each separate interface
> > > (ip l s dev eth0 down). Which was not working before, on system with both
> > > FECs enabled.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
> >
> > I'm OK with this. Maybe a fixes tag ?
>
> Hm. Initial commit was:
> Fixes: 787b4271a6a0 ("clk: imx: add imx6ul clk tree support")
> but this patch will not apply on top of it.
> Next possible commit would be:
> Fixes: 1487b60dc2d2 ("clk: imx6ul: Switch to clk_hw based API")
> But this patch didn't introduce this issue, it was just refactoring.
Hm, in that case I don't think is qoing to be backported ever.
>
> What do you prefer?
I'll apply it as it is.
Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Oleksij
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | |
> Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
> 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists