| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 11:32:51 -0800
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 11/13] netlink: specs: finish up operation enum-models
On 01/27, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> I had a (bright?) idea of introducing the concept of enum-models
> to account for all the weird ways families enumerate their messages.
> I've never finished it because generating C code for each of them
> is pretty daunting. But for languages which can use ID values directly
> the support is simple enough, so clean this up a bit.
> "unified" model is what I recommend going forward.
> "directional" model is what ethtool uses.
> "notify-split" is used by the proposed DPLL code, but we can just
> make them use "unified", it hasn't been merged :)
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> ---
> Documentation/netlink/genetlink-c.yaml | 4 +-
> Documentation/netlink/genetlink-legacy.yaml | 11 ++-
> Documentation/netlink/genetlink.yaml | 4 +-
> .../netlink/genetlink-legacy.rst | 82 +++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/Documentation/netlink/genetlink-c.yaml
> b/Documentation/netlink/genetlink-c.yaml
> index e23e3c94a932..bbcfa2472b04 100644
> --- a/Documentation/netlink/genetlink-c.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/netlink/genetlink-c.yaml
> @@ -218,9 +218,7 @@ additionalProperties: False
> to a single enum.
> "directional" has the messages sent to the kernel and from the
> kernel
> enumerated separately.
> - "notify-split" has the notifications and request-response
> types in
> - different enums.
> - enum: [ unified, directional, notify-split ]
> + enum: [ unified ]
> name-prefix:
> description: |
> Prefix for the C enum name of the command. The name is formed
> by concatenating
> diff --git a/Documentation/netlink/genetlink-legacy.yaml
> b/Documentation/netlink/genetlink-legacy.yaml
> index 88db2431ef26..5642925c4ceb 100644
> --- a/Documentation/netlink/genetlink-legacy.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/netlink/genetlink-legacy.yaml
> @@ -241,9 +241,7 @@ additionalProperties: False
> to a single enum.
> "directional" has the messages sent to the kernel and from the
> kernel
> enumerated separately.
> - "notify-split" has the notifications and request-response
> types in
> - different enums.
> - enum: [ unified, directional, notify-split ]
> + enum: [ unified, directional ] # Trim
> name-prefix:
> description: |
> Prefix for the C enum name of the command. The name is formed
> by concatenating
> @@ -307,6 +305,13 @@ additionalProperties: False
> type: array
> items:
> type: string
> + # Start genetlink-legacy
> + value:
> + description: |
> + ID of this message if value for request and
> response differ,
> + i.e. requests and responses have different
> message enums.
> + $ref: '#/$defs/uint'
> + # End genetlink-legacy
> reply: *subop-attr-list
> pre:
> description: Hook for a function to run before the
> main callback (pre_doit or start).
> diff --git a/Documentation/netlink/genetlink.yaml
> b/Documentation/netlink/genetlink.yaml
> index b5e712bbe7e7..62a922755ce2 100644
> --- a/Documentation/netlink/genetlink.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/netlink/genetlink.yaml
> @@ -188,9 +188,7 @@ additionalProperties: False
> to a single enum.
> "directional" has the messages sent to the kernel and from the
> kernel
> enumerated separately.
> - "notify-split" has the notifications and request-response
> types in
> - different enums.
> - enum: [ unified, directional, notify-split ]
> + enum: [ unified ]
> name-prefix:
> description: |
> Prefix for the C enum name of the command. The name is formed
> by concatenating
> diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/netlink/genetlink-legacy.rst
> b/Documentation/userspace-api/netlink/genetlink-legacy.rst
> index 65cbbffee0bf..ae6053e3e50c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/netlink/genetlink-legacy.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/netlink/genetlink-legacy.rst
> @@ -74,6 +74,88 @@ type. Inside the attr-index nest are the policy
> attributes. Modern
> Netlink families should have instead defined this as a flat structure,
> the nesting serves no good purpose here.
> +Operations
> +==========
> +
> +Enum (message ID) model
> +-----------------------
> +
> +unified
> +~~~~~~~
> +
> +Modern families use the ``unified`` message ID model, which uses
> +a single enumeration for all messages within family. Requests and
> +responses share the same message ID. Notifications have separate
> +IDs from the same space. For example given the following list
> +of operations:
> +
> +.. code-block:: yaml
> +
> + -
> + name: a
> + value: 1
> + do: ...
> + -
> + name: b
> + do: ...
> + -
> + name: c
> + value: 4
> + notify: a
> + -
> + name: d
> + do: ...
> +
> +Requests and responses for aperation ``a`` will have the ID of 1,
s/aperation/operation/ ?
> +the requests and responses of ``b`` - 2 (since there is no explicit
> +``value`` it's previous operation ``+ 1``). Notification ``c`` will
> +used the ID of 4, operation ``d`` 5 etc.
s/used/use/ ?
> +
> +directional
> +~~~~~~~~~~~
> +
> +The ``directional`` model splits the ID assignment by the direction of
> +the message. Messages from and to the kernel can't be confused with
> +each other so this conserves the ID space (at the cost of making
> +the programming more cumbersome).
> +
> +In this case ``value`` attribute should be specified in the ``request``
> +``reply`` sections of the operations (if an operation has both ``do``
> +and ``dump`` the IDs are shared, ``value`` should be set in ``do``).
> +For notifications the ``value`` is provided at the op level but it
> +only allocates a ``reply`` (i.e. a "from-kernel" ID). Let's look
> +at an example:
> +
> +.. code-block:: yaml
> +
> + -
> + name: a
> + do:
[..]
> + request:
> + value: 2
> + attributes: ...
> + reply:
> + value: 1
> + attributes: ...
'attributes' indentation is wrong for both request/reply?
> + -
> + name: b
> + notify: a
> + -
> + name: c
> + notify: a
> + value: 7
> + -
> + name: d
> + do: ...
> +
> +In this case ``a`` will use 2 when sending the message to the kernel
> +and expects message with ID 1 in response. Notificatoin ``b`` allocates
> +a "from-kernel" ID which is 2. ``c`` allocates "from-kernel" ID of 7.
> +If operation ``d`` does not set ``values`` explicitly in the spec
> +it will be allocated 3 for the request (``a`` is the previous operation
> +with a request section and the value of 2) and 8 for response (``c`` is
> +the previous operation in the "from-kernel" direction).
> +
> Other quirks (todo)
> ===================
> --
> 2.39.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists