[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK-6q+gqQgFxqBUAhHDMaWv9VfuKa=bCVee_oSLQeVtk_G8=ow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 19:21:41 -0500
From: Alexander Aring <aahringo@...hat.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>,
Stefan Schmidt <stefan@...enfreihafen.org>,
linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
David Girault <david.girault@...vo.com>,
Romuald Despres <romuald.despres@...vo.com>,
Frederic Blain <frederic.blain@...vo.com>,
Nicolas Schodet <nico@...fr.eu.org>,
Guilhem Imberton <guilhem.imberton@...vo.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH wpan-next v2 0/2] ieee802154: Beaconing support
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 4:55 AM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
> aahringo@...hat.com wrote on Thu, 26 Jan 2023 20:48:02 -0500:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 8:45 PM Alexander Aring <aahringo@...hat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 5:31 AM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Scanning being now supported, we can eg. play with hwsim to verify
> > > > everything works as soon as this series including beaconing support gets
> > > > merged.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Miquèl
> > > >
> > > > Changes in v2:
> > > > * Clearly state in the commit log llsec is not supported yet.
> > > > * Do not use mlme transmission helpers because we don't really need to
> > > > stop the queue when sending a beacon, as we don't expect any feedback
> > > > from the PHY nor from the peers. However, we don't want to go through
> > > > the whole net stack either, so we bypass it calling the subif helper
> > > > directly.
> > > >
> >
> > moment, we use the mlme helpers to stop tx
>
> No, we no longer use the mlme helpers to stop tx when sending beacons
> (but true MLME transmissions, we ack handling and return codes will be
> used for other purposes).
>
then we run into an issue overwriting the framebuffer while the normal
transmit path is active?
> > but we use the
> > ieee802154_subif_start_xmit() because of the possibility to invoke
> > current 802.15.4 hooks like llsec? That's how I understand it.
>
> We go through llsec (see ieee802154_subif_start_xmit() implementation)
> when we send data or beacons. When we send beacons, for now, we just
> discard the llsec logic. This needs of course to be improved. We will
> probably need some llsec handling in the mlme case as well in the near
> future.
>
i agree, thanks.
- Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists