[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9pKZkEzkqypHdB2@salvia>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 12:17:58 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Gavrilov Ilia <Ilia.Gavrilov@...otecs.ru>
Cc: "leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>,
"coreteam@...filter.org" <coreteam@...filter.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"fw@...len.de" <fw@...len.de>, "joe@...ches.com" <joe@...ches.com>,
"kadlec@...filter.org" <kadlec@...filter.org>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"lvc-project@...uxtesting.org" <lvc-project@...uxtesting.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org" <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] netfilter: conntrack: remote a return value of the
'seq_print_acct' function.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 02:31:54PM +0000, Gavrilov Ilia wrote:
> The static 'seq_print_acct' function always returns 0.
>
> Change the return value to 'void' and remove unnecessary checks.
>
> Found by InfoTeCS on behalf of Linux Verification Center
> (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Applied, thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists