[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a0be13d0-22d5-b92b-9fed-4faeed30fdce@ispras.ru>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 19:28:09 +0300
From: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@...ras.ru>
To: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
Cc: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@....org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
dev@...nvswitch.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>,
lvc-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: openvswitch: fix flow memory leak in
ovs_flow_cmd_new
On 2/1/23 6:45 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> I see this would work by virtue of kfree(key) doing nothing
> of key is NULL, the error case in question. And that otherwise key is
> non-NULL if this path is hit.
>
> However, the idiomatic approach to error handling is for the error path
> to unwind resource allocations in the reverse order that they were made.
> And for goto labels to control how far to unwind.
>
You are right, thanks. Have to keep 'goto' structured, otherwise there
would be a 'goto' mess.
> So I think the following would be more in keeping with the intention of the
> code. Even if it is a somewhat more verbose change.
>
> *compile tested only!*
I'll test this on error paths and resend the patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists