netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Add support for QTI Bluetooth chip wcn6855

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 1 Feb 2023 08:19:33 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...i.org>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
        Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
        Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
        Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
        Mark Pearson <markpearson@...ovo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Add support for QTI Bluetooth
 chip wcn6855

On 01/02/2023 04:05, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>> On 31/01/2023 05:38, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>>> Added regulators,GPIOs and changes required to power on/off wcn6855.
>>> Added support for firmware download for wcn6855.
>>>
>>> This is based on commit d8f97da1b92d ("Bluetooth: hci_qca: Add support for QTI Bluetooth chip wcn6750")
> 
>> Drop. If that commit is merged, how is it useful to keep it in git
>> history forever?
> 
> Sorry if that wasn't clear enough, what I meant to say here is that I used that
> commit id as the basis for my work, and it's not based on having access to the
> schematics or spec sheets.

Hm, I still don't find it useful then.

Best regards,
Krzysztof