[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 11:09:30 +0100
From: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
CC: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@...hat.com>, Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next mlxsw v2 07/16] net: bridge: Maintain number of
MDB entries in net_bridge_mcast_port
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org> writes:
> On 01/02/2023 19:28, Petr Machata wrote:
>> @@ -668,6 +692,82 @@ void br_multicast_del_group_src(struct net_bridge_group_src *src,
>> __br_multicast_del_group_src(src);
>> }
>>
>> +static int
>> +br_multicast_port_ngroups_inc_one(struct net_bridge_mcast_port *pmctx,
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> +{
>> + if (pmctx->mdb_max_entries &&
>> + pmctx->mdb_n_entries >= pmctx->mdb_max_entries)
>
> These should be using *_ONCE() because of the next patch.
> KCSAN might be sad otherwise. :)
I didn't see any (relevant) KCSAN warnings on x86_64. But yeah, it
(and the others you cited) should be *_ONCE.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists