[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 09:25:07 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull-request: mlx5-next 2023-01-24 V2
On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 13:14:25 -0400 Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 09:13:12AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 09:46:11 +0200 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > I don't see it in net-next yet, can you please pull it?
> > >
> > > There are outstanding RDMA patches which depend on this shared branch.
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1673960981.git.leon@kernel.org
> >
> > FWIW I'm not nacking this but I'm not putting my name on the merge,
> > either. You need to convince one of the other netdev maintainers to
> > pull.
>
> What is the issue with this PR?
You don't remember me trying to convince you to keep the RoCE stuff
away from our open source IPsec implementation?
> It looks all driver internal to me?
Typical in a proprietary world, like RDMA, isn't it?
I'm just letting you know why I'm not merging it. I'm not the only one
with the keys, find someone else to convince, please.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists