netdev - Re: [PATCH net 3/6] ionic: add check for NULL t/rxqcqs in reconfig

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230202124615.1bf1a2f9@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 2 Feb 2023 12:46:15 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@....com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, drivers@...sando.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 3/6] ionic: add check for NULL t/rxqcqs in reconfig

On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 12:06:52 -0800 Shannon Nelson wrote:
> On 2/2/23 10:05 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 17:29:59 -0800 Shannon Nelson wrote:  
> >> Make sure there are qcqs to clean before trying to swap resources
> >> or clean their interrupt assignments.  
> > 
> > ... Otherwise $what-may-happen
> > 
> > Bug fixes should come with an explanation of what the user-visible
> > misbehavior is  
> 
> I can add some text here and post a v2.
> 
> Would you prefer I repost some of these as net-next rather than net as 
> Leon was suggesting, or keep this patchset together for v2?  I have a 
> couple other larger net-next patches getting ready as well...

I'm not sure what the user impact of the fixes is, but at a glance
splitting this into separate series makes most sense. We merge net 
into net-next every Thu, so if there is a dependency the wait should
not be too long.