| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1675414355.7766702-3-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 16:52:35 +0800
From: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/33] virtio_net: xsk: introduce virtnet_rq_bind_xsk_pool()
On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 03:48:33 -0500, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 07:00:45PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > This function is used to bind or unbind xsk pool to virtnet rq.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/virtio/Makefile | 2 +-
> > drivers/net/virtio/main.c | 8 ++---
> > drivers/net/virtio/virtio_net.h | 16 ++++++++++
> > drivers/net/virtio/xsk.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/net/virtio/xsk.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/Makefile b/drivers/net/virtio/Makefile
> > index 15ed7c97fd4f..8c2a884d2dba 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/Makefile
> > @@ -5,4 +5,4 @@
> >
> > obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_NET) += virtio_net.o
> >
> > -virtio_net-y := main.o
> > +virtio_net-y := main.o xsk.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/main.c b/drivers/net/virtio/main.c
> > index 049a3bb9d88d..0ee23468b795 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio/main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/main.c
> > @@ -110,7 +110,6 @@ struct padded_vnet_hdr {
> > char padding[12];
> > };
> >
> > -static void virtnet_rq_free_unused_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, void *buf);
> > static void virtnet_sq_free_unused_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, void *buf);
> >
> > static void *xdp_to_ptr(struct xdp_frame *ptr)
> > @@ -1351,8 +1350,7 @@ static int add_recvbuf_mergeable(struct virtnet_info *vi,
> > * before we're receiving packets, or from refill_work which is
> > * careful to disable receiving (using napi_disable).
> > */
> > -static bool try_fill_recv(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq,
> > - gfp_t gfp)
> > +bool try_fill_recv(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq, gfp_t gfp)
> > {
> > int err;
> > bool oom;
> > @@ -1388,7 +1386,7 @@ static void skb_recv_done(struct virtqueue *rvq)
> > virtqueue_napi_schedule(&rq->napi, rvq);
> > }
> >
> > -static void virtnet_napi_enable(struct virtqueue *vq, struct napi_struct *napi)
> > +void virtnet_napi_enable(struct virtqueue *vq, struct napi_struct *napi)
> > {
> > napi_enable(napi);
> >
> > @@ -3284,7 +3282,7 @@ static void virtnet_sq_free_unused_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, void *buf)
> > xdp_return_frame(ptr_to_xdp(buf));
> > }
> >
> > -static void virtnet_rq_free_unused_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, void *buf)
> > +void virtnet_rq_free_unused_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, void *buf)
>
> If you are making this an API now you better document
> what it does. Same applies to other stuff you are
> making non-static.
I agree.
>
>
> > {
> > struct virtnet_info *vi = vq->vdev->priv;
> > int i = vq2rxq(vq);
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_net.h b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_net.h
> > index b46f083a630a..4a7633714802 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_net.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_net.h
> > @@ -168,6 +168,12 @@ struct send_queue {
> >
> > /* Record whether sq is in reset state. */
> > bool reset;
> > +
> > + struct {
> > + struct xsk_buff_pool __rcu *pool;
> > +
> > + dma_addr_t hdr_dma_address;
> > + } xsk;
> > };
> >
> > /* Internal representation of a receive virtqueue */
> > @@ -200,6 +206,13 @@ struct receive_queue {
> > char name[16];
> >
> > struct xdp_rxq_info xdp_rxq;
> > +
> > + struct {
> > + struct xsk_buff_pool __rcu *pool;
> > +
> > + /* xdp rxq used by xsk */
> > + struct xdp_rxq_info xdp_rxq;
> > + } xsk;
> > };
> >
> > static inline bool is_xdp_raw_buffer_queue(struct virtnet_info *vi, int q)
> > @@ -274,4 +287,7 @@ int virtnet_xdp_handler(struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
> > unsigned int *xdp_xmit,
> > struct virtnet_rq_stats *stats);
> > int virtnet_tx_reset(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct send_queue *sq);
> > +bool try_fill_recv(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq, gfp_t gfp);
> > +void virtnet_napi_enable(struct virtqueue *vq, struct napi_struct *napi);
> > +void virtnet_rq_free_unused_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, void *buf);
> > #endif
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/xsk.c b/drivers/net/virtio/xsk.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..e01ff2abea11
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/xsk.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> > +/*
> > + * virtio-net xsk
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include "virtio_net.h"
> > +
> > +static int virtnet_rq_bind_xsk_pool(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq,
> > + struct xsk_buff_pool *pool, struct net_device *dev)
>
> This static function is unused after this patch, so compiler will
> complain. Yes it's just a warning but still not nice.
Otherwise, we need merge some patches, which will increase the difficulty of
review.
Is there a better way to deal with? Remove Static?
Thanks.
>
>
> > +{
> > + bool running = netif_running(vi->dev);
> > + int err, qindex;
> > +
> > + qindex = rq - vi->rq;
> > +
> > + if (pool) {
> > + err = xdp_rxq_info_reg(&rq->xsk.xdp_rxq, dev, qindex, rq->napi.napi_id);
> > + if (err < 0)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > + err = xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(&rq->xsk.xdp_rxq,
> > + MEM_TYPE_XSK_BUFF_POOL, NULL);
> > + if (err < 0) {
> > + xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rq->xsk.xdp_rxq);
> > + return err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + xsk_pool_set_rxq_info(pool, &rq->xsk.xdp_rxq);
> > + } else {
> > + xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rq->xsk.xdp_rxq);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (running)
> > + napi_disable(&rq->napi);
> > +
> > + err = virtqueue_reset(rq->vq, virtnet_rq_free_unused_buf);
> > + if (err)
> > + netdev_err(vi->dev, "reset rx fail: rx queue index: %d err: %d\n", qindex, err);
> > +
> > + if (pool) {
> > + if (err)
> > + xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rq->xsk.xdp_rxq);
> > + else
> > + rcu_assign_pointer(rq->xsk.pool, pool);
> > + } else {
> > + rcu_assign_pointer(rq->xsk.pool, NULL);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL))
> > + schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
> > +
> > + if (running)
> > + virtnet_napi_enable(rq->vq, &rq->napi);
> > +
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > --
> > 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists