[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y90bRHerUsBhFIcl@corigine.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 15:33:40 +0100
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Oz Shlomo <ozsh@...dia.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@...hat.com>,
Baowen Zheng <baowen.zheng@...igine.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/9] net/sched: support per action hw stats
On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 06:10:34PM +0200, Oz Shlomo wrote:
> There are currently two mechanisms for populating hardware stats:
> 1. Using flow_offload api to query the flow's statistics.
> The api assumes that the same stats values apply to all
> the flow's actions.
> This assumption breaks when action drops or jumps over following
> actions.
> 2. Using hw_action api to query specific action stats via a driver
> callback method. This api assures the correct action stats for
> the offloaded action, however, it does not apply to the rest of the
> actions in the flow's actions array.
>
> Extend the flow_offload stats callback to indicate that a per action
> stats update is required.
> Use the existing flow_offload_action api to query the action's hw stats.
> In addition, currently the tc action stats utility only updates hw actions.
> Reuse the existing action stats cb infrastructure to query any action
> stats.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oz Shlomo <ozsh@...dia.com>
...
> diff --git a/include/net/pkt_cls.h b/include/net/pkt_cls.h
> index be21764a3b34..d4315757d1a2 100644
> --- a/include/net/pkt_cls.h
> +++ b/include/net/pkt_cls.h
> @@ -292,9 +292,15 @@ static inline void tcf_exts_put_net(struct tcf_exts *exts)
> #define tcf_act_for_each_action(i, a, actions) \
> for (i = 0; i < TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO && ((a) = actions[i]); i++)
>
> +static bool tc_act_in_hw(struct tc_action *act)
> +{
> + return !!act->in_hw_count;
> +}
> +
> static inline void
> tcf_exts_hw_stats_update(const struct tcf_exts *exts,
> - struct flow_stats *stats)
> + struct flow_stats *stats,
> + bool use_act_stats)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
> int i;
> @@ -302,16 +308,18 @@ static inline void tcf_exts_put_net(struct tcf_exts *exts)
> for (i = 0; i < exts->nr_actions; i++) {
> struct tc_action *a = exts->actions[i];
>
> - /* if stats from hw, just skip */
> - if (tcf_action_update_hw_stats(a)) {
> - preempt_disable();
> - tcf_action_stats_update(a, stats->bytes, stats->pkts, stats->drops,
> - stats->lastused, true);
> - preempt_enable();
> -
> - a->used_hw_stats = stats->used_hw_stats;
> - a->used_hw_stats_valid = stats->used_hw_stats_valid;
> + if (use_act_stats || tc_act_in_hw(a)) {
> + tcf_action_update_hw_stats(a);
Hi Oz,
I am a unclear why it is ok to continue here even if
tcf_action_update_hw_stats() fails. There seem to be cases other than
!tc_act_in_hw() at play here, which prior to this patch, would execute the
code below that is now outside this if clause.
> + continue;
> }
> +
> + preempt_disable();
> + tcf_action_stats_update(a, stats->bytes, stats->pkts, stats->drops,
> + stats->lastused, true);
> + preempt_enable();
> +
> + a->used_hw_stats = stats->used_hw_stats;
> + a->used_hw_stats_valid = stats->used_hw_stats_valid;
> }
> #endif
> }
> @@ -769,6 +777,7 @@ struct tc_cls_matchall_offload {
> enum tc_matchall_command command;
> struct flow_rule *rule;
> struct flow_stats stats;
> + bool use_act_stats;
> unsigned long cookie;
> };
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/act_api.c b/net/sched/act_api.c
> index 917827199102..eda58b78da13 100644
> --- a/net/sched/act_api.c
> +++ b/net/sched/act_api.c
> @@ -169,11 +169,6 @@ static bool tc_act_skip_sw(u32 flags)
> return (flags & TCA_ACT_FLAGS_SKIP_SW) ? true : false;
> }
>
> -static bool tc_act_in_hw(struct tc_action *act)
> -{
> - return !!act->in_hw_count;
> -}
> -
> /* SKIP_HW and SKIP_SW are mutually exclusive flags. */
> static bool tc_act_flags_valid(u32 flags)
> {
> @@ -308,9 +303,6 @@ int tcf_action_update_hw_stats(struct tc_action *action)
> struct flow_offload_action fl_act = {};
> int err;
>
> - if (!tc_act_in_hw(action))
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -
> err = offload_action_init(&fl_act, action, FLOW_ACT_STATS, NULL);
> if (err)
> return err;
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists