[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y90b8QvITvsIiYfS@shredder>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 16:36:33 +0200
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
To: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 07/16] net: bridge: Maintain number of MDB
entries in net_bridge_mcast_port
On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 06:59:25PM +0100, Petr Machata wrote:
> The MDB maintained by the bridge is limited. When the bridge is configured
> for IGMP / MLD snooping, a buggy or malicious client can easily exhaust its
> capacity. In SW datapath, the capacity is configurable through the
> IFLA_BR_MCAST_HASH_MAX parameter, but ultimately is finite. Obviously a
> similar limit exists in the HW datapath for purposes of offloading.
>
> In order to prevent the issue of unilateral exhaustion of MDB resources,
> introduce two parameters in each of two contexts:
>
> - Per-port and per-port-VLAN number of MDB entries that the port
> is member in.
>
> - Per-port and (when BROPT_MCAST_VLAN_SNOOPING_ENABLED is enabled)
> per-port-VLAN maximum permitted number of MDB entries, or 0 for
> no limit.
>
> The per-port multicast context is used for tracking of MDB entries for the
> port as a whole. This is available for all bridges.
>
> The per-port-VLAN multicast context is then only available on
> VLAN-filtering bridges on VLANs that have multicast snooping on.
>
> With these changes in place, it will be possible to configure MDB limit for
> bridge as a whole, or any one port as a whole, or any single port-VLAN.
>
> Note that unlike the global limit, exhaustion of the per-port and
> per-port-VLAN maximums does not cause disablement of multicast snooping.
> It is also permitted to configure the local limit larger than hash_max,
> even though that is not useful.
>
> In this patch, introduce only the accounting for number of entries, and the
> max field itself, but not the means to toggle the max. The next patch
> introduces the netlink APIs to toggle and read the values.
>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists