netdev - Re: remove arch/sh

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f6a60193-a5d1-c42c-158a-4b0bfe9c7538@infradead.org>
Date:   Fri, 3 Feb 2023 07:57:12 -0800
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: remove arch/sh

Hi--

On 2/3/23 02:33, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
> 
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 11:29 AM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
>> On Fri, 2023-02-03 at 09:30 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 09:24:46AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>>>> Since this is my very first time stepping up as a kernel maintainer, I was hoping
>>>> to get some pointers on what to do to make this happen.
>>>>
>>>> So far, we have set up a new kernel tree and I have set up a local development and
>>>> test environment for SH kernels using my SH7785LCR board as the target platform.
>>>>
>>>> Do I just need to send a patch asking to change the corresponding entry in the
>>>> MAINTAINERS file?
>>>
>>> I'm not sure a there is a document, but:
>>>
>>>  - add the MAINTAINERS change to your tree
>>>  - ask Stephen to get your tree included in linux-next
>>>
>>> then eventually send a pull request to Linus with all of that.  Make
>>> sure it's been in linux-next for a while.
>>
>> OK, thanks for the pointers! Will try to get this done by next week.
>>
>> We're still discussing among SuperH developer community whether there will be a second
>> maintainer, so please bear with us a few more days. I will collect patches in the
>> meantime.
> 
> Thanks a lot!
> 
> If you need any help with process, setup, ... don't hesitate to ask
> (on e.g. #renesas-soc on Libera).

While Adrian and Geert are reading this, I have a question:

Is this "sh64" still accurate and applicable? from Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst:

But some architectures such as x86 and sparc have aliases.

- x86: i386 for 32 bit, x86_64 for 64 bit
- sh: sh for 32 bit, sh64 for 64 bit <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
- sparc: sparc32 for 32 bit, sparc64 for 64 bit



Thanks.
-- 
~Randy