[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0280ecbc-06e4-72ce-95f8-17217833c19f@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 22:57:22 +0100
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
andrew@...n.ch, linux@...linux.org.uk, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
michael@...le.cc
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: micrel: Add support for lan8841 PHY
On 03.02.2023 16:10, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> The 02/03/2023 14:55, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>
> Hi Heiner,
>
>>
>> On 03.02.2023 13:25, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>> +
>>> +#define LAN8841_OUTPUT_CTRL 25
>>> +#define LAN8841_OUTPUT_CTRL_INT_BUFFER BIT(14)
>>> +#define LAN8841_CTRL 31
>>> +#define LAN8841_CTRL_INTR_POLARITY BIT(14)
>>> +static int lan8841_config_intr(struct phy_device *phydev)
>>> +{
>>> + struct irq_data *irq_data;
>>> + int temp = 0;
>>> +
>>> + irq_data = irq_get_irq_data(phydev->irq);
>>> + if (!irq_data)
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> + if (irqd_get_trigger_type(irq_data) & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH) {
>>> + /* Change polarity of the interrupt */
>>
>> Why this a little bit esoteric logic? Can't you set the interrupt
>> to level-low in the chip (like most other ones), and then define
>> the polarity the usual way e.g. in DT?
>
> To set the interrupt to level-low it needs to be set to open-drain and
> in that case I can't use the polarity register, because doesn't have any
> effect on the interrupt. So I can't set the interrupt to level low and
> then use the polarity to select if it is high or low.
> That is the reason why I have these checks.
>
To me this still doesn't look right. After checking the datasheet I'd say:
At first open-drain should be preferred because only in this mode the
interrupt line can be shared.
And if you use level-low and open-drain, why would you want to fiddle
with the polarity? Level-low and open-drain is the only mode supported by
most PHY's and it's totally fine. Or do you have a special use case where
you want to connect the interrupt pin to an interrupt controller that
only supports level-high and has no programmable inverter in its path?
>>
>>> + phy_modify(phydev, LAN8841_OUTPUT_CTRL,
>>> + LAN8841_OUTPUT_CTRL_INT_BUFFER,
>>> + LAN8841_OUTPUT_CTRL_INT_BUFFER);
>>> + phy_modify(phydev, LAN8841_CTRL,
>>> + LAN8841_CTRL_INTR_POLARITY,
>>> + LAN8841_CTRL_INTR_POLARITY);
>>> + } else {
>>> + /* It is enough to set INT buffer to open-drain because then
>>> + * the interrupt will be active low.
>>> + */
>>> + phy_modify(phydev, LAN8841_OUTPUT_CTRL,
>>> + LAN8841_OUTPUT_CTRL_INT_BUFFER, 0);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* enable / disable interrupts */
>>> + if (phydev->interrupts == PHY_INTERRUPT_ENABLED)
>>> + temp = LAN8814_INT_LINK;
>>> +
>>> + return phy_write(phydev, LAN8814_INTC, temp);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static irqreturn_t lan8841_handle_interrupt(struct phy_device *phydev)
>>> +{
>>> + int irq_status;
>>> +
>>> + irq_status = phy_read(phydev, LAN8814_INTS);
>>> + if (irq_status < 0) {
>>> + phy_error(phydev);
>>> + return IRQ_NONE;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (irq_status & LAN8814_INT_LINK) {
>>> + phy_trigger_machine(phydev);
>>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return IRQ_NONE;
>>> +}
>>> +
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists