netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 04/11] net: dsa: microchip: lan937x: update port number for LAN9373

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 4 Feb 2023 01:26:46 +0200
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Rakesh.Sankaranarayanan@...rochip.com
Cc:     andrew@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, kuba@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 04/11] net: dsa: microchip: lan937x: update
 port number for LAN9373

On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 10:43:40AM +0000, Rakesh.Sankaranarayanan@...rochip.com wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> On Thu, 2023-02-02 at 16:19 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > LAN9373 have total 8 physical ports. Update port_cnt member in
> > > ksz_chip_data structure.
> > 
> > This seems more like a fix. Should it be applied to net, not net-
> > next,
> > and have Fixes: tag?
> > 
> >     Andrew
> 
> Yes, I will update and send it as separate net patch with fixes tag.

What's the story here? Arun must have surely known this isn't a 5 port switch?