[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230203232646.fwnvovw5ssbo7cpj@skbuf>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 01:26:46 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Rakesh.Sankaranarayanan@...rochip.com
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net, linux@...linux.org.uk,
Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, kuba@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 04/11] net: dsa: microchip: lan937x: update
port number for LAN9373
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 10:43:40AM +0000, Rakesh.Sankaranarayanan@...rochip.com wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Thu, 2023-02-02 at 16:19 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > LAN9373 have total 8 physical ports. Update port_cnt member in
> > > ksz_chip_data structure.
> >
> > This seems more like a fix. Should it be applied to net, not net-
> > next,
> > and have Fixes: tag?
> >
> > Andrew
>
> Yes, I will update and send it as separate net patch with fixes tag.
What's the story here? Arun must have surely known this isn't a 5 port switch?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists