[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y96R+oEaZijtdaFH@corigine.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 18:12:26 +0100
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: lan966x: Add support for TC flower filter
statistics
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 02:53:49PM +0100, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> Add flower filter packet statistics. This will just read the TCAM
> counter of the rule, which mention how many packages were hit by this
> rule.
I am curious to know how HW stats only updating the packet count
interacts with SW stats also incrementing other values, such as the byte
count.
> Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
> ---
> .../microchip/lan966x/lan966x_tc_flower.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_tc_flower.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_tc_flower.c
> index 88c655d6318fa..aac3d7c87f1d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_tc_flower.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_tc_flower.c
> @@ -234,6 +234,26 @@ static int lan966x_tc_flower_del(struct lan966x_port *port,
> return err;
> }
>
> +static int lan966x_tc_flower_stats(struct lan966x_port *port,
> + struct flow_cls_offload *f,
> + struct vcap_admin *admin)
> +{
> + struct vcap_counter count;
> + int err;
> +
> + memset(&count, 0, sizeof(count));
nit: As was pointed out to me recently it's simpler to declare
count as follows and skip the memset entirely.
No need to respin for this!
struct vcap_counter count = {};
> +
> + err = vcap_get_rule_count_by_cookie(port->lan966x->vcap_ctrl,
> + &count, f->cookie);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + flow_stats_update(&f->stats, 0x0, count.value, 0, 0,
> + FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_IMMEDIATE);
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> int lan966x_tc_flower(struct lan966x_port *port,
> struct flow_cls_offload *f,
> bool ingress)
> @@ -252,6 +272,8 @@ int lan966x_tc_flower(struct lan966x_port *port,
> return lan966x_tc_flower_add(port, f, admin, ingress);
> case FLOW_CLS_DESTROY:
> return lan966x_tc_flower_del(port, f, admin);
> + case FLOW_CLS_STATS:
> + return lan966x_tc_flower_stats(port, f, admin);
> default:
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> }
> --
Also, not strictly related, but could you consider, as a favour to
reviewers, fixing the driver so that the following doesn't fail:
$ make drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_tc_flower.o
DESCEND objtool
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
CC drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_tc_flower.o
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_tc_flower.c:3:
drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.h:18:10: fatal error: vcap_api.h: No such file or directory
18 | #include <vcap_api.h>
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists