[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230203195459.6576e80a@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 19:54:59 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net-next] net: mscc: ocelot: un-export unused regmap
symbols
On Sat, 4 Feb 2023 03:34:39 +0200 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> These can be unexported too:
>
> extern const struct vcap_field vsc7514_vcap_es0_keys[];
> extern const struct vcap_field vsc7514_vcap_es0_actions[];
> extern const struct vcap_field vsc7514_vcap_is1_keys[];
> extern const struct vcap_field vsc7514_vcap_is1_actions[];
> extern const struct vcap_field vsc7514_vcap_is2_keys[];
> extern const struct vcap_field vsc7514_vcap_is2_actions[];
>
> I guess we make exceptions for the 24 hour reposting rule when the patch
> has been reviewed?
FWIW I think that it's perfectly fine to skip the wait whenever
reviewer explicitly asks for a quick repost. The only person who's
judgment we don't trust is the author (including me not trusting
myself when I post my own patches).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists