netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/9] net/sched: act_pedit, setup offload action for action stats query

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y+DbNFogMZWPPhNB@corigine.com>
Date:   Mon, 6 Feb 2023 11:49:24 +0100
From:   Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To:     Oz Shlomo <ozsh@...dia.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>,
        Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@...hat.com>,
        Baowen Zheng <baowen.zheng@...igine.com>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH  net-next v2 2/9] net/sched: act_pedit, setup offload
 action for action stats query

On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 03:55:18PM +0200, Oz Shlomo wrote:
> A single tc pedit action may be translated to multiple flow_offload
> actions.
> Offload only actions that translate to a single pedit command value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oz Shlomo <ozsh@...dia.com>
> 
> ---
> Change log:
> 
> V1 -> V2:
>     - Add extack message on error
>     - Assign the flow action id outside the for loop.
>       Ensure the rest of the pedit actions follow the assigned id.
> ---
>  net/sched/act_pedit.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sched/act_pedit.c b/net/sched/act_pedit.c
> index c42fcc47dd6d..dae88e205cb1 100644
> --- a/net/sched/act_pedit.c
> +++ b/net/sched/act_pedit.c
> @@ -545,7 +545,33 @@ static int tcf_pedit_offload_act_setup(struct tc_action *act, void *entry_data,
>  		}
>  		*index_inc = k;
>  	} else {
> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +		struct flow_offload_action *fl_action = entry_data;
> +		u32 cmd = tcf_pedit_cmd(act, 0);
> +		u32 last_cmd;
> +		int k;
> +
> +		switch (cmd) {
> +		case TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_CMD_SET:
> +			fl_action->id = FLOW_ACTION_MANGLE;
> +			break;
> +		case TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_CMD_ADD:
> +			fl_action->id = FLOW_ACTION_ADD;
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Unsupported pedit command offload");
> +			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +		}
> +
> +		for (k = 1; k < tcf_pedit_nkeys(act); k++) {
> +			cmd = tcf_pedit_cmd(act, k);
> +
> +			if (cmd != last_cmd) {

Hi Oz,

Is last_cmd initialised for the first iteration of this loop?

> +				NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Unsupported pedit command offload");
> +				return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +			}
> +
> +			last_cmd = cmd;
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
>