netdev - [PATCH net-next 41/47] can: bittiming: can_fixup_bittiming(): report error via netlink and harmonize error value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230206131620.2758724-42-mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Mon,  6 Feb 2023 14:16:14 +0100
From:   Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...gutronix.de, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        Vincent Mailhol <vincent.mailhol@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 41/47] can: bittiming: can_fixup_bittiming(): report error via netlink and harmonize error value

Check each bit timing parameter first individually against their
limits and report a meaningful error message via netlink to the user
space.

In case of an error, return -EINVAL instead of -ERANGE, this
corresponds better to the actual meaning of the error value.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230202110854.2318594-12-mkl@pengutronix.de
Suggested-by: Vincent Mailhol <vincent.mailhol@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
---
 drivers/net/can/dev/bittiming.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/dev/bittiming.c b/drivers/net/can/dev/bittiming.c
index 101de1b3bf30..727dcd52cc2c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/dev/bittiming.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/dev/bittiming.c
@@ -33,22 +33,38 @@ static int can_fixup_bittiming(const struct net_device *dev, struct can_bittimin
 			       const struct can_bittiming_const *btc,
 			       struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
 {
+	const unsigned int tseg1 = bt->prop_seg + bt->phase_seg1;
 	const struct can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
-	unsigned int tseg1;
 	u64 brp64;
 	int err;
 
+	if (tseg1 < btc->tseg1_min) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT(extack, "prop-seg + phase-seg1: %u less than tseg1-min: %u",
+				   tseg1, btc->tseg1_min);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	if (tseg1 > btc->tseg1_max) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT(extack, "prop-seg + phase-seg1: %u greater than tseg1-max: %u",
+				   tseg1, btc->tseg1_max);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	if (bt->phase_seg2 < btc->tseg2_min) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT(extack, "phase-seg2: %u less than tseg2-min: %u",
+				   bt->phase_seg2, btc->tseg2_min);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	if (bt->phase_seg2 > btc->tseg2_max) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT(extack, "phase-seg2: %u greater than tseg2-max: %u",
+				   bt->phase_seg2, btc->tseg2_max);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	can_sjw_set_default(bt);
 
 	err = can_sjw_check(dev, bt, btc, extack);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	tseg1 = bt->prop_seg + bt->phase_seg1;
-	if (tseg1 < btc->tseg1_min || tseg1 > btc->tseg1_max ||
-	    bt->phase_seg2 < btc->tseg2_min || bt->phase_seg2 > btc->tseg2_max)
-		return -ERANGE;
-
 	brp64 = (u64)priv->clock.freq * (u64)bt->tq;
 	if (btc->brp_inc > 1)
 		do_div(brp64, btc->brp_inc);
@@ -58,8 +74,16 @@ static int can_fixup_bittiming(const struct net_device *dev, struct can_bittimin
 		brp64 *= btc->brp_inc;
 	bt->brp = (u32)brp64;
 
-	if (bt->brp < btc->brp_min || bt->brp > btc->brp_max)
+	if (bt->brp < btc->brp_min) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT(extack, "resulting brp: %u less than brp-min: %u",
+				   bt->brp, btc->brp_min);
 		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	if (bt->brp > btc->brp_max) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT(extack, "resulting brp: %u greater than brp-max: %u",
+				   bt->brp, btc->brp_max);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
 
 	bt->bitrate = priv->clock.freq / (bt->brp * can_bit_time(bt));
 	bt->sample_point = ((CAN_SYNC_SEG + tseg1) * 1000) / can_bit_time(bt);
-- 
2.39.1