lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <23fc6ed6d91cb3fa528976b782a6d2605bbf17dd.camel@siemens.com>
Date:   Mon, 6 Feb 2023 14:50:54 +0000
From:   "Valek, Andrej" <andrej.valek@...mens.com>
To:     "andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>
CC:     "vivien.didelot@...il.com" <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: DSA mv88e6xxx_probe

Hello again,

I put some more "debugs" there.

> 	/* assert bus level PHY GPIO reset */
> 	dev_info(&bus->dev, "getting gpiod\n");
> 	gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&bus->dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> 	if(gpiod) dev_info(&bus->dev, "gpio found1\n");
> 	else dev_info(&bus->dev, "gpio NOT found1\n");
>
> 	/*if (IS_ERR(gpiod)) {
> 		dev_info(&bus->dev, "gpiod error\n");
> 		err = dev_err_probe(&bus->dev, PTR_ERR(gpiod),
> 				    "mii_bus %s couldn't get reset GPIO\n",
> 				    bus->id);
> 		device_del(&bus->dev);
> 		return err;
> 	}*/
>
> 	if (gpiod) {
> 		dev_info(&bus->dev, "%p:gpiod found\n", gpiod);
> 		bus->reset_gpiod = gpiod;
> 		fsleep(bus->reset_delay_us);
> 		gpiod_set_value_cansleep(gpiod, 0);
> 		if (bus->reset_post_delay_us > 0)
> 			fsleep(bus->reset_post_delay_us);
> 	}

After that I see messages like:
> [    1.530251] mdio_bus 5b040000.ethernet-1: device registered
> [    1.535840] mdio_bus 5b040000.ethernet-1: getting gpiod
> [    1.541150] mdio_bus 5b040000.ethernet-1: gpio found1
> [    1.546210] mdio_bus 5b040000.ethernet-1: fffffffffffffdfb:gpiod found
> [    1.567900] gpiod_set_value_cansleep: invalid GPIO (errorpointer)

So there is a problem, that function "devm_gpiod_get_optional" is not returning the correct pointer.

Regards,
Andrej

On Fri, 2023-02-03 at 14:47 +0000, Valek, Andrej wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-02-03 at 14:54 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > > > This looks promising. So I have to just move the "reset-
> > > > > gpios" DTB
> > > > > entry from switch to mdio section. But which driver handles
> > > > > it,
> > > > > drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c,
> > > > 
> > > > Yes.
> > > > 
> > > > > > mdio {
> > > > > >         #address-cells = <1>;
> > > > > >         #size-cells = 0>;
> > > > > while here is no compatible part... .
> > > > 
> > > > It does not need a compatible, because it is part of the FEC,
> > > > and the
> > > > FEC has a compatible. Remember this is device tree, sometimes
> > > > you need
> > > > to go up the tree towards the root to find the actual device
> > > > with a
> > > > compatible.
> > > > 
> > > >     Andrew
> > > I tried put the "reset-gpios" and "reset-delay-us" into multiple
> > > mdio locations, but nothing has been working. DTB looks like
> > > that:
> > > 
> > > > &fec1 {
> > > >         pinctrl-names = "default";
> > > >         pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_fec1>;
> > > >         phy-mode = "rgmii-id";
> > > >         tx-internal-delay-ps = <2000>;
> > > >         rx-internal-delay-ps = <2000>;
> > > >         slaves = <1>;                   // use only one emac if
> > > >         status = "okay";
> > > >         mac-address = [ 00 00 00 00 00 00 ]; // Filled in by U-
> > > > Boot
> > > > 
> > > >         // #### 3. try ####
> > > >         //phy-reset-gpios = <&lsio_gpio0 13 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> > > >         //reset-delay-us = <10000>;
> > > > 
> > > >         fixed-link {
> > > >                 speed = <1000>;
> > > >                 full-duplex;
> > > >         };
> > > > 
> > > >         mdio {
> > > >                 #address-cells = <1>;
> > > >                 #size-cells = <0>;
> > > > 
> > > >                 // 1. try
> > > >                 reset-gpios = <&lsio_gpio0 13 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> > > >                 reset-delay-us = <10000>;
> > 
> > This looks like the correct location. Have you put a printk() after
> > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c#L569
> > to make sure it has found it?
> > 
> Yes, I put there multiple printk-s... .
> >         dev_info(&bus->dev, "device registered\n");
> > 
> >         mutex_init(&bus->mdio_lock);
> >         mutex_init(&bus->shared_lock);
> > 
> >         /* assert bus level PHY GPIO reset */
> >         gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&bus->dev, "reset",
> > GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> >         dev_info(&bus->dev, "getting gpiod\n");
> > 
> >         if (IS_ERR(gpiod)) {
> >                 err = dev_err_probe(&bus->dev, PTR_ERR(gpiod),
> >                                     "mii_bus %s couldn't get reset
> > GPIO\n",
> >                                     bus->id);
> >                 device_del(&bus->dev);
> >                 return err;
> >         } else  if (gpiod) {
> >                 dev_info(&bus->dev, "gpiod found\n");
> >                 bus->reset_gpiod = gpiod;
> >                 fsleep(bus->reset_delay_us);
> >                 gpiod_set_value_cansleep(gpiod, 0);
> >                 if (bus->reset_post_delay_us > 0)
> >                         fsleep(bus->reset_post_delay_us);
> >         }
> > 
> >         if (bus->reset) {
> >                 dev_info(&bus->dev, "reset found\n");
> >                 err = bus->reset(bus);
> 
> And the output log looks:
> > [    1.446095] mdio_bus fixed-0: device registered
> > [    1.450698] mdio_bus fixed-0: getting gpiod
> > [    1.494870] pps pps0: new PPS source ptp0
> > [    1.505888] mdio_bus 5b040000.ethernet-1: device registered
> > [    1.511552] mdio_bus 5b040000.ethernet-1: getting gpiod
> > [    1.550705] pps pps0: new PPS source ptp0
> > [    1.561203] mdio_bus 5b050000.ethernet-1: device registered
> > [    1.566791] mdio_bus 5b050000.ethernet-1: getting gpiod
> > ...
> > [    2.568174] fec 5b050000.ethernet eth0: registered PHC device 0
> 
> Sp there are only a "device registered" and "getting gpiod" messages
> and nor "gpiod found" and "resed found".
> So now the question is why it didn't find the reset in dtb, or where
> to place it.
> 
> Andrej
> 
> > You might also need a post reset delay. I'm not sure the device
> > will
> > answer if it is still busy reading the EEPROM. Which is why the
> > mv88e6xxx hardware reset does some polling before continuing.
> > 
> >           Andrew
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ