lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Y9yb301OYUknwUlH@bullseye> Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 05:30:07 +0000 From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...il.com> To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> Cc: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>, Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, jakub@...udflare.com, hdanton@...a.com, cong.wang@...edance.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v2 0/3] vsock: add support for sockmap On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 12:08:49PM -0800, Cong Wang wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 08:35:11PM -0800, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > Add support for sockmap to vsock. > > > > We're testing usage of vsock as a way to redirect guest-local UDS requests to > > the host and this patch series greatly improves the performance of such a > > setup. > > > > Compared to copying packets via userspace, this improves throughput by 121% in > > basic testing. > > > > Tested as follows. > > > > Setup: guest unix dgram sender -> guest vsock redirector -> host vsock server > > Threads: 1 > > Payload: 64k > > No sockmap: > > - 76.3 MB/s > > - The guest vsock redirector was > > "socat VSOCK-CONNECT:2:1234 UNIX-RECV:/path/to/sock" > > Using sockmap (this patch): > > - 168.8 MB/s (+121%) > > - The guest redirector was a simple sockmap echo server, > > redirecting unix ingress to vsock 2:1234 egress. > > - Same sender and server programs > > > > *Note: these numbers are from RFC v1 > > > > Only the virtio transport has been tested. The loopback transport was used in > > writing bpf/selftests, but not thoroughly tested otherwise. > > > > This series requires the skb patch. > > > > Looks good to me. Definitely good to go as non-RFC. > > Thanks. Thank you for the review. Best, Bobby
Powered by blists - more mailing lists