[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+DQxN9ybYqfozRr@corigine.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 11:04:52 +0100
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Bo Liu <liubo03@...pur.com>
Cc: johannes@...solutions.net, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] rfkill: Use sysfs_emit() to instead of
sprintf()
On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 03:16:41AM -0500, Bo Liu wrote:
> Follow the advice of the Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst and show()
> should only use sysfs_emit() or sysfs_emit_at() when formatting the
> value to be returned to user space.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bo Liu <liubo03@...pur.com>
> ---
> net/rfkill/core.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Hi Bo Liu,
A brief summary of changes since v1 should go here.
Comparing v1 and v2 manually, I see that you have addressed the minor
issues raised in the review of v1:
* the checkpatch warning regarding ' )'
* Including target tree, net-next, in subject
Ref: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/Y91bc2LWMl+DsjcW@corigine.com/
So, FWIIW, I am happy with this patch now.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists