[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+GhTEpwx+jP8S09@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 01:54:36 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Arun.Ramadoss@...rochip.com, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 08/23] net: phy: migrate phy_init_eee() to
genphy_c45_eee_is_active()
On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 02:50:35PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Reduce code duplicated by migrating phy_init_eee() to
> genphy_c45_eee_is_active().
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
This makes sense, but as i said in a different thread, i think the
MAC/PHY API needs improving at some point, which could result in this
function going away. But this patchset is big enough as it is.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists