lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM6PR12MB42028E512EAB5BA1BB8845F9C1DB9@DM6PR12MB4202.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Feb 2023 15:01:15 +0000
From:   "Lucero Palau, Alejandro" <alejandro.lucero-palau@....com>
To:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        "Lucero Palau, Alejandro" <alejandro.lucero-palau@....com>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-net-drivers (AMD-Xilinx)" <linux-net-drivers@....com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "habetsm.xilinx@...il.com" <habetsm.xilinx@...il.com>,
        "ecree.xilinx@...il.com" <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>,
        "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
        "jiri@...dia.com" <jiri@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 7/8] sfc: add support for devlink
 port_function_hw_addr_get in ef100


On 2/2/23 12:09, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 12:14:22PM CET, alejandro.lucero-palau@....com wrote:
>> From: Alejandro Lucero <alejandro.lucero-palau@....com>
>>
>> Using the builtin client handle id infrastructure, this patch adds
> Don't talk about "this patch". Just tell the codebase what to do.

OK

>
>> support for obtaining the mac address linked to mports in ef100. This
>> implies to execute an MCDI command for getting the data from the
>> firmware for each devlink port.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <alejandro.lucero-palau@....com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.c   | 27 +++++++++++++
>> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.h   |  1 +
>> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_rep.c   |  8 ++++
>> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_rep.h   |  1 +
>> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_devlink.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 5 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.c
>> index aa48c79a2149..becd21c2325d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.c
>> @@ -1122,6 +1122,33 @@ static int ef100_probe_main(struct efx_nic *efx)
>> 	return rc;
>> }
>>
>> +/* MCDI commands are related to the same device issuing them. This function
>> + * allows to do an MCDI command on behalf of another device, mainly PFs setting
>> + * things for VFs.
>> + */
>> +int efx_ef100_lookup_client_id(struct efx_nic *efx, efx_qword_t pciefn, u32 *id)
>> +{
>> +	MCDI_DECLARE_BUF(outbuf, MC_CMD_GET_CLIENT_HANDLE_OUT_LEN);
>> +	MCDI_DECLARE_BUF(inbuf, MC_CMD_GET_CLIENT_HANDLE_IN_LEN);
>> +	u64 pciefn_flat = le64_to_cpu(pciefn.u64[0]);
>> +	size_t outlen;
>> +	int rc;
>> +
>> +	MCDI_SET_DWORD(inbuf, GET_CLIENT_HANDLE_IN_TYPE,
>> +		       MC_CMD_GET_CLIENT_HANDLE_IN_TYPE_FUNC);
>> +	MCDI_SET_QWORD(inbuf, GET_CLIENT_HANDLE_IN_FUNC,
>> +		       pciefn_flat);
>> +
>> +	rc = efx_mcdi_rpc(efx, MC_CMD_GET_CLIENT_HANDLE, inbuf, sizeof(inbuf),
>> +			  outbuf, sizeof(outbuf), &outlen);
>> +	if (rc)
>> +		return rc;
>> +	if (outlen < sizeof(outbuf))
>> +		return -EIO;
>> +	*id = MCDI_DWORD(outbuf, GET_CLIENT_HANDLE_OUT_HANDLE);
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> int ef100_probe_netdev_pf(struct efx_nic *efx)
>> {
>> 	struct ef100_nic_data *nic_data = efx->nic_data;
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.h
>> index e59044072333..f1ed481c1260 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.h
>> @@ -94,4 +94,5 @@ int ef100_filter_table_probe(struct efx_nic *efx);
>>
>> int ef100_get_mac_address(struct efx_nic *efx, u8 *mac_address,
>> 			  int client_handle, bool empty_ok);
>> +int efx_ef100_lookup_client_id(struct efx_nic *efx, efx_qword_t pciefn, u32 *id);
>> #endif	/* EFX_EF100_NIC_H */
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_rep.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_rep.c
>> index 6b5bc5d6955d..0b3083ef0ead 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_rep.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_rep.c
>> @@ -361,6 +361,14 @@ bool ef100_mport_on_local_intf(struct efx_nic *efx,
>> 		     mport_desc->interface_idx == nic_data->local_mae_intf;
>> }
>>
>> +bool ef100_mport_is_vf(struct mae_mport_desc *mport_desc)
>> +{
>> +	bool pcie_func;
>> +
>> +	pcie_func = ef100_mport_is_pcie_vnic(mport_desc);
>> +	return pcie_func && (mport_desc->vf_idx != MAE_MPORT_DESC_VF_IDX_NULL);
>> +}
>> +
>> void efx_ef100_init_reps(struct efx_nic *efx)
>> {
>> 	struct ef100_nic_data *nic_data = efx->nic_data;
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_rep.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_rep.h
>> index ae6add4b0855..a042525a2240 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_rep.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_rep.h
>> @@ -76,4 +76,5 @@ void efx_ef100_fini_reps(struct efx_nic *efx);
>> struct mae_mport_desc;
>> bool ef100_mport_on_local_intf(struct efx_nic *efx,
>> 			       struct mae_mport_desc *mport_desc);
>> +bool ef100_mport_is_vf(struct mae_mport_desc *mport_desc);
>> #endif /* EF100_REP_H */
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_devlink.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_devlink.c
>> index afdb19f0c774..c44547b9894e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_devlink.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_devlink.c
>> @@ -60,6 +60,56 @@ static int efx_devlink_add_port(struct efx_nic *efx,
>>
>> 	return devl_port_register(efx->devlink, &mport->dl_port, mport->mport_id);
>> }
>> +
>> +static int efx_devlink_port_addr_get(struct devlink_port *port, u8 *hw_addr,
>> +				     int *hw_addr_len,
>> +				     struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> +{
>> +	struct efx_devlink *devlink = devlink_priv(port->devlink);
>> +	struct mae_mport_desc *mport_desc;
>> +	efx_qword_t pciefn;
>> +	u32 client_id;
>> +	int rc = 0;
> Pointless init.
>
>

Right

>> +
>> +	mport_desc = container_of(port, struct mae_mport_desc, dl_port);
>> +
>> +	if (!ef100_mport_on_local_intf(devlink->efx, mport_desc)) {
>> +		rc = -EINVAL;
>> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT(extack,
>> +				   "Port not on local interface (mport: %u)",
>> +				   mport_desc->mport_id);
>> +		goto out;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (ef100_mport_is_vf(mport_desc))
>> +		EFX_POPULATE_QWORD_3(pciefn,
>> +				     PCIE_FUNCTION_PF, PCIE_FUNCTION_PF_NULL,
>> +				     PCIE_FUNCTION_VF, mport_desc->vf_idx,
>> +				     PCIE_FUNCTION_INTF, PCIE_INTERFACE_CALLER);
>> +	else
>> +		EFX_POPULATE_QWORD_3(pciefn,
>> +				     PCIE_FUNCTION_PF, mport_desc->pf_idx,
>> +				     PCIE_FUNCTION_VF, PCIE_FUNCTION_VF_NULL,
>> +				     PCIE_FUNCTION_INTF, PCIE_INTERFACE_CALLER);
>> +
>> +	rc = efx_ef100_lookup_client_id(devlink->efx, pciefn, &client_id);
>> +	if (rc) {
>> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT(extack,
>> +				   "No internal client_ID for port (mport: %u)",
>> +				   mport_desc->mport_id);
>> +		goto out;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	rc = ef100_get_mac_address(devlink->efx, hw_addr, client_id, true);
>> +	if (rc != 0)
> why "if (rc)" is not enough here?
>

Right

>> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT(extack,
>> +				   "No available MAC for port (mport: %u)",
>> +				   mport_desc->mport_id);
> It is redundant to print mport_id which is exposed as devlink port id.
> Please remove from the all the extack messages. No need to mention
> "port" at all, as the user knows on which object he is performing the
> command.

I think the idea was to have such a report to user space as input from a 
client to our support team which could help.

But I guess you are right, and that info would also be reported without 
specifically adding it here.


> Also, perhaps it would sound better to say "No MAC available"?
>
>

That subtle change could imply a total different meaning ... at least in 
my native language. But I will not fight this one :-) and change it in the
next version.

>> +out:
>> +	*hw_addr_len = ETH_ALEN;
> Odd. I think you should not touch hw_addr_len in case of error.
>

It does not harm. Does it?

Otherwise, I need another goto in previous error checking what seems odd 
for a single line.

>> +	return rc;
>> +}
>> +
>> #endif
>>
>> static int efx_devlink_info_nvram_partition(struct efx_nic *efx,
>> @@ -522,6 +572,9 @@ static int efx_devlink_info_get(struct devlink *devlink,
>>
>> static const struct devlink_ops sfc_devlink_ops = {
>> 	.info_get			= efx_devlink_info_get,
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SFC_SRIOV
>> +	.port_function_hw_addr_get	= efx_devlink_port_addr_get,
>> +#endif
>> };
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SFC_SRIOV
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ