netdev - Re: [PATCH] rfkill: Use sysfs_emit() to instead of sprintf()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87pmal7bsh.fsf@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 07 Feb 2023 17:09:02 +0200
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To:     Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
Cc:     Bo Liu <liubo03@...pur.com>, johannes@...solutions.net,
        davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rfkill: Use sysfs_emit() to instead of sprintf()

Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com> writes:

> Hi Bo Liu,
>
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 03:17:18AM -0500, Bo Liu wrote:
>> Follow the advice of the Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst and show()
>> should only use sysfs_emit() or sysfs_emit_at() when formatting the
>> value to be returned to user space.
>
> Thanks for your patch. As it is not a bug fix it should be targeted at
> 'net-next' (as opposed to 'net'). This should be specified in the patch
> subject something like this:
>
> [PATCH net-next v2] rfkill: Use sysfs_emit() to instead of sprintf()

rfkill patches should go to wireless-next, right?

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches