netdev - [PATCH v4 net-next 1/4] net-sysctl: factor out cpumask parsing helper

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <8e69455b0e3bc339ca6c00f04fe86660e2aad58b.1675789134.git.pabeni@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue,  7 Feb 2023 19:44:55 +0100
From:   Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 net-next 1/4] net-sysctl: factor out cpumask parsing helper

Will be used by the following patch to avoid code
duplication. No functional changes intended.

The only difference is that now flow_limit_cpu_sysctl() will
always compute the flow limit mask on each read operation,
even when read() will not return any byte to user-space.

Note that the new helper is placed under a new #ifdef at
the file start to better fit the usage in the later patch

Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
---
v3 -> v4:
 - fix warning reported by the kernel test robot
---
 net/core/sysctl_net_core.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c b/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c
index e7b98162c632..6935ecdc84b0 100644
--- a/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c
+++ b/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c
@@ -45,6 +45,33 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sysctl_fb_tunnels_only_for_init_net);
 int sysctl_devconf_inherit_init_net __read_mostly;
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(sysctl_devconf_inherit_init_net);
 
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_FLOW_LIMIT)
+static void dump_cpumask(void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos,
+			 struct cpumask *mask)
+{
+	char kbuf[128];
+	int len;
+
+	if (*ppos || !*lenp) {
+		*lenp = 0;
+		return;
+	}
+
+	len = min(sizeof(kbuf) - 1, *lenp);
+	len = scnprintf(kbuf, len, "%*pb", cpumask_pr_args(mask));
+	if (!len) {
+		*lenp = 0;
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (len < *lenp)
+		kbuf[len++] = '\n';
+	memcpy(buffer, kbuf, len);
+	*lenp = len;
+	*ppos += len;
+}
+#endif
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_RPS
 static int rps_sock_flow_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
 				void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
@@ -155,13 +182,6 @@ static int flow_limit_cpu_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
 write_unlock:
 		mutex_unlock(&flow_limit_update_mutex);
 	} else {
-		char kbuf[128];
-
-		if (*ppos || !*lenp) {
-			*lenp = 0;
-			goto done;
-		}
-
 		cpumask_clear(mask);
 		rcu_read_lock();
 		for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
@@ -171,17 +191,7 @@ static int flow_limit_cpu_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
 		}
 		rcu_read_unlock();
 
-		len = min(sizeof(kbuf) - 1, *lenp);
-		len = scnprintf(kbuf, len, "%*pb", cpumask_pr_args(mask));
-		if (!len) {
-			*lenp = 0;
-			goto done;
-		}
-		if (len < *lenp)
-			kbuf[len++] = '\n';
-		memcpy(buffer, kbuf, len);
-		*lenp = len;
-		*ppos += len;
+		dump_cpumask(buffer, lenp, ppos, mask);
 	}
 
 done:
-- 
2.39.1