netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/17] crypto: api - Change completion callback argument to void star

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 6 Feb 2023 23:10:08 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:     Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
        Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...nel.org>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Tyler Hicks <code@...icks.com>, ecryptfs@...r.kernel.org,
        Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
        Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
        Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
        linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
        Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        Jon Maloy <jmaloy@...hat.com>,
        Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com>,
        Boris Pismenny <borisp@...dia.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/17] crypto: api - Change completion callback argument
 to void star

On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 18:21:06 +0800 Herbert Xu wrote:
> The crypto completion function currently takes a pointer to a
> struct crypto_async_request object.  However, in reality the API
> does not allow the use of any part of the object apart from the
> data field.  For example, ahash/shash will create a fake object
> on the stack to pass along a different data field.

"different data field" == copy the value to a different structure?
A bit hard to parse TBH.

> This leads to potential bugs where the user may try to dereference
> or otherwise use the crypto_async_request object.
> 
> This series changes the completion function to take a void *
> argument instead of crypto_async_request.
> 
> This series touches code in a number of different subsystems.
> Most of them are trivial except for tls which was actually buggy
> as it did exactly what was described above.

Buggy means bug could be hit in real light or buggy == did not use 
the API right?

> I'd like to pull all the changes through the crypto tree.  But
> feel free to object if you'd like the relevant patches to go
> through your trees instead and I'll split this up.